Training materials—the Vertical Agreements Block Exemption and Distribution Agreements (EU)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert
Precedents

Training materials—the Vertical Agreements Block Exemption and Distribution Agreements (EU)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert

Precedents
imgtext

This Precedent presentation has been designed as a training aid that you can use to provide an overview to junior competition lawyers, non-competition lawyers or commercial colleagues on the application of the EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption 2022/720 (EU VBER) to distribution agreements. It provides a brief outline of the application of Article 101(1) TFEU, a detailed summary of the key provisions of the

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Popular documents

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of

Micklefield clauses

Micklefield clausesWhat is a Micklefield clause?It is common for employee share plans to provide that, on termination of employment (or when an employee is given or receives notice of termination of employment), subsisting share awards will be forfeited and subsisting share options will lapse.It is

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to

Where are misrepresentations made? Jurisdictional traps for the unwary (Bellmare Holdings Ltd v Wells)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The High Court has provided concise guidance as to how misrepresentation should be analysed when considering jurisdictional gateways. Under Article 5(3) of the Lugano Convention, in negligent misstatement cases, the place of the event giving rise to damage is normally