Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of the judgment?
- What was the background?
- What did the Court of Appeal decide?
Article summary
Property analysis: Cecily Crampin, barrister at Falcon Chambers, examines the Court of Appeal’s confirmation of the Upper Tribunal’s (UT) decision on how a premium paid by an underlessee to extend the underlease should be apportioned between the respondent freeholder and the appellant intermediate leaseholder.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial