Table of contents
- Original news
- What was the background to this case?
- What did the court have to decide?
- What was the outcome?
- Are there any wider lessons for lawyers to take from this case?
Article summary
IP & IT analysis: George Peretz QC of Monckton Chambers explores Teva v EMA and explains why the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) opted for a decision that appears to serve the objective emphasised in the recitals to Regulation (EC) 141/2000.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial