Borderline products

Although it may be immediately obvious that a product is a medicine and should be regulated as such, some products are more difficult to distinguish from medicines or medical devices and may function for a medicinal purpose and another purpose, such as a cosmetic purpose. For these products, the classification is not immediately clear and multiple regulatory frameworks may apply. For example, it may be uncertain whether a more complex healthcare product might be viewed as a medical device, cosmetic, food, dietary supplement, herbal medicine or biocidal product. Sometimes it is certain circumstances or if certain criteria are met or even claims made about the product’s use that might cause it to be classified as a medicinal product, so it can be unclear which regulatory framework one should comply with for an effective regulatory strategy. These products are called borderline products until their status has been decided.

The regulatory classification of a product can have important ramifications, for example, on how the product is regulated (and by whom), how long it will take before such product can be commercialised (especially if pre-market approval is required), how the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Life Sciences News

Life Sciences weekly highlights—26 February 2026

This week's edition of Life Sciences weekly highlights includes a Law 360 analysis on the Court of Appeal dismissing Salts Healthcare Ltd’s renewed attempts to find Pelican Healthcare Ltd liable for infringing one of its patents over an ostomy bag and an analysis by Hepworth Browne of the UK Supreme Court’s ruling in Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, in which the court reshaped the foundations of UK patent law by reorientating the assessment of exclusions to patentability. Also included, is news that the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals in a biotechnology patent dispute regarding the production of microbial oil for nutritional products, the EU General Court issued orders in challenges concerning the revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) on the grounds of admissibility, not addressing the substantive question of the legality of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme, the MHRA and NICE have jointly published guidance on the Integrated Scientific Advice service, EFPIA published a report assessing the economic and societal contribution of industry-sponsored clinical trials in Europe as well as a comparative analysis of biopharmaceutical strategies across ten countries, and news that the UK Research and Innovation announced its first AI strategy, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) announced £150m for three UK Research and Innovation programmes, as well as MHRA updates reporting a rise in clinical investigations, the launch of a fee waiver pilot for small firms, a statement on the paused PATHWAYS clinical trial, and enforcement action involving the seizure of unlicensed weight loss medicines, among other stories.

View Life Sciences by content type :

Popular documents