Home / Arbitration / Arbitration in England and Wales / Conducting the arbitration

Legal News

Most lawyers keen to limit AI use in Arbitration

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 15 November 2023
Published by a Law360 reporter

Article summary

Law360: Two-thirds of legal professionals say there should be greater transparency about the use of artificial intelligence tools in arbitration, as fears mount over their rapid uptake in the field, according to a new survey.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom and Ireland

Related documents:

2 Checklists
4 News
View More
4 Practice notes
View More
2 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

2 Checklists
4 News
View More
4 Practice notes
View More
2 Q&As

Popular documents

Arbitral awards—types, requirements and effect

Arbitral awards—types, requirements and effectSTOP PRESS: This Practice Note is currently Under Review in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025. For further information on when the new act comes into force see Practice Note: When will the Arbitration Act 2025 come into force?Note: some of the

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)STOP PRESS: This Practice Note has been updated in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025 and contains reference to amended provisions in the Arbitration Act 1996. For further information on when the new act comes

Arbitration agreements—the doctrine of separability (England and Wales)

Arbitration agreements—the doctrine of separability (England and Wales)This Practice Note considers the doctrine of separability under the law of England and Wales (England and English are used as shorthand throughout). This Practice Note should be read in conjunction with Practice Note:

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitration

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitrationAn ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support