Claims in contract and tort in English law

For more guidance on claims, causes of action and remedies in English law beyond the Practice Notes below, see the Dispute Resolution module.

Contract interpretation

Interpreting contracts—the guiding principles

This Practice Note summarises the principles applied when interpreting the meaning of contracts, starting with Lord Hoffman’s dicta in Investors Compensation Scheme, ie the objective test (reasonable person), the relevance of background knowledge and the factual matrix, the exclusion of previous negotiations and subjective intent, and the natural and ordinary meaning of words and the specific words used.

See Practice Note: Contract interpretation—the guiding principles.

Rules of contract interpretation

This Practice Note considers key cases (Rainy Sky v Kookmin, Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita) and specific rules including: whole of the document relevant, commercial common sense (business common sense), avoiding an unreasonable result, saving the document, consistency of terms, standard and printed terms and general and special conditions, mistakes, contra proferentem, ejusdem generis and NOM clauses (No Oral Modification Clauses).

See Practice Note: Contract interpretation—rules of contract interpretation.

Contract

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Arbitration News

Justices pass on US$55m arbitrator misconduct petition

Law360: The US Supreme Court declined 2 March 2026 to take up a petition asking it to resolve whether an arbitration conducted by a three-member tribunal was fundamentally fair if one arbitrator 'functionally abandoned his post' during a hearing.

Dutch Supreme Court confirms—leave to enforce foreign award is final—no appeal allowed

Arbitration analysis: It is established in the Netherlands case law that a court decision granting leave to enforce a foreign arbitral award cannot be appealed. In a recent case before the Dutch Supreme Court, the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) sought to challenge this principle. It did not succeed: despite NIOC’s arguments, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its settled case law. Written by Hans Biezenaar, senior associate at Houthoff.

Arbitration weekly highlights—5 March 2026

This week's edition of Arbitration weekly highlights includes: an analysis of the UK Supreme Court guidance on ICSID enforcement, holding that article 54(1) of the ICSID Convention is a clear waiver of adjudicative state immunity under State Immunity Act 1978, s 2(2), alongside other arbitration-related decisions from England and Wales, the UAE, Brazil, Spain, Singapore and the USA, and further updates from AIAC, CEPANI, DIS and FINRA. All this, and more, in our weekly highlights.

AAA launches AI-powered tool for non-binding dispute modelling and strategy assessment

The American Arbitration Association (AAA) has announced the launch of its ‘Resolution Simulator’, an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tool designed to deliver non-binding simulated decisions in documents-only commercial and construction disputes. The tool expands the functionality of the AAA’s AI Arbitrator platform, applying the same structured legal reasoning and analytical framework to generate a simulated outcome based on a user’s submissions and feedback. Designed for single-party use, it provides explainable, informational insights intended to help parties understand how an arbitrator may analyse and resolve a dispute, assess potential exposure, and evaluate legal or negotiation strategy before commencing formal proceedings. The simulator may also assist with internal discussions with clients or counsel and inform consideration of alternative resolution pathways, such as settlement or mediation. According to the AAA, the Resolution Simulator responds to user demand for practical evaluative and decision-support tools, particularly at the early stages of a dispute, and will be showcased alongside other AI solutions at Legalweek 2026.