Claims in contract and tort in English law

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

For more guidance on claims, causes of action and remedies in English law beyond the Practice Notes below, see the Dispute Resolution module.

Contract interpretation

Interpreting contracts—the guiding principles

This Practice Note summarises the principles applied when interpreting the meaning of contracts, starting with Lord Hoffman’s dicta in Investors Compensation Scheme, ie the objective test (reasonable person), the relevance of background knowledge and the factual matrix, the exclusion of previous negotiations and subjective intent, and the natural and ordinary meaning of words and the specific words used.

See Practice Note: Contract interpretation—the guiding principles.

Rules of contract interpretation

This Practice Note considers key cases (Rainy Sky v Kookmin, Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita) and specific rules including: whole of the document relevant, commercial common sense (business common sense), avoiding an unreasonable result, saving the document, consistency of terms, standard and printed terms and general and special conditions, mistakes, contra proferentem, ejusdem generis and NOM clauses (No Oral Modification Clauses).

See Practice Note: Contract interpretation—rules of contract interpretation.

Contract

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Arbitration News

Israeli ruling shows a Non-EU ICSID enforcement approach

Law360, Expert analysis: The 25 August 2025 decision of the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court, handed down by retired Judge Yehudit Shevah in Sun-Flower Olmeda GMBH & Co KG v The Kingdom of Spain, presents an unusual and instructive moment at the confluence of investment arbitration and regional public law. Josep Galvez, barrister at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, explores how the Israeli court’s cautious approach balances its obligations under the ICSID Convention with sensitivity to the broader international uncertainty surrounding intra-EU investment arbitration.

Arbitration Appeal No 2 of 2024–Serious irregularity Appeal under rule 68 of the Scottish Arbitration Rules

Arbitration analysis: Arbitration Appeal No.2 of 2024 concerned a farming partnership dispute and an appeal to the Outer House of the Court of Session challenging the decision of an arbitrator dated 14 June 2024 on the basis that there was a serious irregularity in the conduct of the arbitration under Rule 68 of the Scottish Arbitration Rules (as contained in Schedule 1 of the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010). The Outer House (Lord Sandison) dismissed the petition and confirmed the arbitrator’s award under Rule 68(3)(a) of the Scottish Arbitration Rules. In dismissing the petition, the Outer House reiterated the high hurdle to be overcome for a serious irregularity appeal against an arbitral award to succeed before the Scottish courts. The court also provided useful guidance on the role of pleadings and what issues should be considered as intrinsic to such disputes put before an arbitrator. The court also demonstrated a willingness to draw upon English authorities in its consideration of the construction and operation of Rule 68 of the Scottish Arbitration Rules. Written by Chris Stephen, advocate (Scotland) at Ampersand Advocates and barrister (England & Wales) at Three Stone Chambers.

The global divergence of Crypto Regulation—A push to set the standard

Arbitration analysis: As cryptoassets assume a more prominent role in global finance, governments have taken markedly different approaches to their regulation. In this article, Julia Wakeman examines how jurisdictions are responding to these challenges and why the regulatory landscape for cryptoassets will remain subject to close scrutiny in the years ahead. Written By Julia Wakeman of P.R.I.M.E. Finance Summer Interns 2025.

CAM publishes report on Italian Arbitration Day addressing arbitration abuse risks

The Milan Chamber of Arbitration (CAM) has published an in-depth report by Raquel Macedo Moreira on the 2025 Italian Arbitration Day held on 4 June 2025. The report captures discussions among 200 international arbitration professionals on the theme ‘International Arbitration: False Friends and True Foes—Navigating the Fine Line Between Use and Abuse’, highlighting growing concerns about the misuse and strategic manipulation of arbitration’s core features.

View Arbitration by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

The seat of the arbitration

The seat of the arbitrationThis Practice Note considers the key concept of the seat of an arbitration, with a particular focus on the law of England and Wales and Northern Ireland (England and English are used as shorthand throughout). Practice Note: Choosing the seat of arbitration may also be of

Arbitration agreements—example domestic arbitration clause (England and Wales)

Arbitration agreements—example domestic arbitration clause (England and Wales)Arbitration clauses and agreements provide for disputes to be dealt with by an appointed arbitral tribunal and can arise in both domestic and international contexts. For more information on arbitration agreements, see the

Interest on costs and damages in arbitration

Interest on costs and damages in arbitrationThis Practice Note considers the law and practice of awarding interest on damages and costs in international commercial arbitration proceedings, including under the law of England and Wales and the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996). Reference is also made to

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)STOP PRESS: This Practice Note has been updated in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025 and contains reference to amended provisions in the Arbitration Act 1996. For further information on when the new act comes
The seat of the arbitration

The seat of the arbitration

The seat of the arbitrationThis Practice Note considers the key concept of the seat of an arbitration, with a particular focus on the law of England and Wales and Northern Ireland (England and English are used as shorthand throughout). Practice Note: Choosing the seat of arbitration may also be of

Arbitration agreements—example domestic arbitration clause (England and Wales)

Arbitration agreements—example domestic arbitration clause (England and Wales)

Arbitration agreements—example domestic arbitration clause (England and Wales)Arbitration clauses and agreements provide for disputes to be dealt with by an appointed arbitral tribunal and can arise in both domestic and international contexts. For more information on arbitration agreements, see the

Interest on costs and damages in arbitration

Interest on costs and damages in arbitration

Interest on costs and damages in arbitrationThis Practice Note considers the law and practice of awarding interest on damages and costs in international commercial arbitration proceedings, including under the law of England and Wales and the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996). Reference is also made to

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)STOP PRESS: This Practice Note has been updated in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025 and contains reference to amended provisions in the Arbitration Act 1996. For further information on when the new act comes