Claims in contract and tort in English law

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

For more guidance on claims, causes of action and remedies in English law beyond the Practice Notes below, see the Dispute Resolution module.

Contract interpretation

Interpreting contracts—the guiding principles

This Practice Note summarises the principles applied when interpreting the meaning of contracts, starting with Lord Hoffman’s dicta in Investors Compensation Scheme, ie the objective test (reasonable person), the relevance of background knowledge and the factual matrix, the exclusion of previous negotiations and subjective intent, and the natural and ordinary meaning of words and the specific words used.

See Practice Note: Contract interpretation—the guiding principles.

Rules of contract interpretation

This Practice Note considers key cases (Rainy Sky v Kookmin, Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita) and specific rules including: whole of the document relevant, commercial common sense (business common sense), avoiding an unreasonable result, saving the document, consistency of terms, standard and printed terms and general and special conditions, mistakes, contra proferentem, ejusdem generis and NOM clauses (No Oral Modification Clauses).

See Practice Note: Contract interpretation—rules of contract interpretation.

Contract

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Arbitration News

CIAM-CIAR publishes its seventh report on Expert Determination in ADR disputes

The Madrid International Arbitration Center – Ibero-American Arbitration Center (CIAM-CIAR) Working Group on International Arbitration published its seventh report titled Expert Determination. This document explores Expert Determination (ED) as a binding alternative dispute resolution method, particularly suited to technical and commercial disputes. It outlines the procedural framework, including the contractual basis, expert appointment, and the role of nominating entities. ED is distinguished by its speed, cost-efficiency, confidentiality, and reliance on subject-matter expertise, with the expert’s decision being final and enforceable by prior agreement of the parties.

NAI appoints three new Advisory Board members and secretary

The Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI) has appointed three new members to its Advisory Board: Carlijn ten Bruggencate, Marco Eliens and Dominique Aarts alongside Jocelynn Tetelepta as the new secretary. According to the NAI, the Advisory Board, comprising up to 25 members, provides both solicited and unsolicited advice to the NAI board on matters related to policy, organisation and positioning within international arbitration. The NAI further clarified that the board does not influence the outcome of individual cases.

Supreme Court upholds costs award in sterling (Process & Industrial Developments Ltd v The Federal Republic of Nigeria)

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed Process & Industrial Developments Ltd’s (P&ID) appeal against a costs order made in favour of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Nigeria). The court held that the Commercial Court and Court of Appeal were correct to award costs in sterling rather than in Nigeria’s national currency, the naira. It ruled that costs orders are discretionary and not compensatory in nature like damages awards and that it was appropriate to make the order in the currency in which Nigeria incurred and paid its legal expenses. The court found no error in law in the lower court’s decision and noted that there was no resulting ’windfall' to Nigeria despite currency fluctuations. Duarte G. Henriques of Victoria Associates, Nikki Hussey of Eversheds Sutherland and Elizabeth Kantor of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer comment on the implications of the judgment.

DIS publishes report highlighting settlement facilitation trends under 2018 Arbitration Rules

The German Arbitration Institute (DIS) has published a report prepared by the DIS Rules Clinic Practice Group on Settlement, which was co-led by Ulrike Gantenberg, Dr. Nicoletta Kröger, Patricia Peterson and Axel Reeg. The report examines the evolving landscape of settlement facilitation under Article 26 of the 2018 DIS Arbitration Rules, examining both innovative practices and jurisdictional sensitivities. As international arbitration continues to embrace efficiency and cost-effectiveness, the role of arbitral tribunals in promoting amicable resolution becomes increasingly significant.

View Arbitration by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

The seat of the arbitration

The seat of the arbitrationThis Practice Note considers the key concept of the seat of an arbitration, with a particular focus on the law of England and Wales and Northern Ireland (England and English are used as shorthand throughout). Practice Note: Choosing the seat of arbitration may also be of

Arbitral awards—types, requirements and effect

Arbitral awards—types, requirements and effectSTOP PRESS: This Practice Note is currently Under Review in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025. For further information on when the new act comes into force see Practice Note: When will the Arbitration Act 2025 come into force?Note: some of the

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)STOP PRESS: This Practice Note has been updated in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025 and contains reference to amended provisions in the Arbitration Act 1996. For further information on when the new act comes

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitration

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitrationAn ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support
The seat of the arbitration

The seat of the arbitration

The seat of the arbitrationThis Practice Note considers the key concept of the seat of an arbitration, with a particular focus on the law of England and Wales and Northern Ireland (England and English are used as shorthand throughout). Practice Note: Choosing the seat of arbitration may also be of

Arbitral awards—types, requirements and effect

Arbitral awards—types, requirements and effect

Arbitral awards—types, requirements and effectSTOP PRESS: This Practice Note is currently Under Review in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025. For further information on when the new act comes into force see Practice Note: When will the Arbitration Act 2025 come into force?Note: some of the

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)

Law of the arbitration proceedings—curial law or lex arbitri (England and Wales)STOP PRESS: This Practice Note has been updated in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025 and contains reference to amended provisions in the Arbitration Act 1996. For further information on when the new act comes

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitration

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitration

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitrationAn ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support