Table of contents
- What are the practical implications of the decision?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Article summary
Corporate Crime analysis: Lucy Mair, barrister at Garden Court North Chambers, examines the Administrative Court’s decision to quash the defendant’s conclusion that the claimant was not a victim of human trafficking. The court found for the claimant on grounds regarding her credibility and the correct definition of forced labour in a domestic setting for the purposes of human trafficking.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial