Sexual offences

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Sexual Offences Act 2003

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 (SOA 2003) came into force on the 1 May 2004. It repealed almost all of the existing statute law in relation to sexual offences.

The SOA 2003 removed the element of consent from many offences, so that only the act itself and the age of the complainant has to be proved. These offences include those in which the complainant is:

  1. •

    a child under 16 (including under 13)

  2. •

    a child under 18 having sexual relations with persons in a position of trust

  3. •

    a child under 18 involved with family members over 18

  4. •

    a person with a mental disorder impeding choice

  5. •

    a person with a mental disorder who are induced threatened or deceived, and

  6. •

    a person with a mental disorder who have sexual relations with care workers.

The offences where consent must be proved are rape, assault by penetration, sexual assault and causing a person to engage in sexual activity (SOA 2003, ss 1–4).

There are three main provisions in the SOA 2003 relating to consent:

  1. •

    the statutory definition of consent

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate Crime News

Health and safety prosecution round-up—16 June 2025

A round-up of the latest health and safety prosecutions including a site supervisor fined after exposing primary school pupils and staff to asbestos during renovation work.

Trading standards prosecutions round-up—16 June 2025

A round-up of the latest trading standards prosecutions, including a home improvement trader jailed for fraud.

Sentencing guidelines amended ahead of incoming Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Act 2025

The Sentencing Council has announced amendments to several existing sentencing guidelines in preparation for the passing of the Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill 2025. The changes, effective from 16 June 2025, amend the expanded explanations on specific drop-down sections that appear across various guidelines, as well as amendments to other overarching and offence specific guidelines, so that they comply with the upcoming legislation. A revised version of the imposition of community and custodial sentences guideline will take effect from 1 September 2025. The amendments aim to clarify guidance on the use of pre-sentence reports.

AML: FATF plenary approves revised standards on payment transparency and guidance on financial inclusion and RBA

The latest Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary has announced, among other developments, that it has approved revisions to Recommendation 16 of the FATF Standards on strengthening payment transparency, in addition to endorsing new guidance on financial inclusion and the risk-based approach (RBA). The guidance includes approaches to address de-risking and the application of simplified due diligence (SDD). At the same time, the FATF has revised its assessment methodology to bring it in line with changes to Recommendation 1 of its Standards.

View Corporate Crime by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Defences in driving cases

Defences in driving casesDefendant to raise their defenceA number of defences may apply in road traffic cases. These include:•automatism•insanity•duress and necessity, and•the 'hip flask' defenceWhen the defendant relies on a specific defence, they must place sufficient evidence before the court to

Causing fear or provocation of violence

Causing fear or provocation of violenceThe offence of causing fear or provocation of violenceThe offence of causing fear or provocation of violence (threatening behaviour) is an offence created by section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986). The offence can only be tried summarily in the

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasons

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasonsWhat are special reasons in driving sentencing?Special reasons are a category of mitigating arguments that can: •prevent a defendant from being disqualified from driving or reduce the length of a driving disqualification or•prevent a defendant from

Can an interim driving disqualification order be imposed during an adjournment to determine special

Can an interim driving disqualification order be imposed during an adjournment to determine special reasons in driving offence proceedings?Section 26 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (RTOA 1988) provides the courts with the ability to order an interim disqualification order where, in respect
Defences in driving cases

Defences in driving cases

Defences in driving casesDefendant to raise their defenceA number of defences may apply in road traffic cases. These include:•automatism•insanity•duress and necessity, and•the 'hip flask' defenceWhen the defendant relies on a specific defence, they must place sufficient evidence before the court to

Causing fear or provocation of violence

Causing fear or provocation of violence

Causing fear or provocation of violenceThe offence of causing fear or provocation of violenceThe offence of causing fear or provocation of violence (threatening behaviour) is an offence created by section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986). The offence can only be tried summarily in the

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasons

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasons

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasonsWhat are special reasons in driving sentencing?Special reasons are a category of mitigating arguments that can: •prevent a defendant from being disqualified from driving or reduce the length of a driving disqualification or•prevent a defendant from

Can an interim driving disqualification order be imposed during an adjournment to determine special

Can an interim driving disqualification order be imposed during an adjournment to determine special

Can an interim driving disqualification order be imposed during an adjournment to determine special reasons in driving offence proceedings?Section 26 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (RTOA 1988) provides the courts with the ability to order an interim disqualification order where, in respect