Sexual offences

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Sexual Offences Act 2003

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 (SOA 2003) came into force on the 1 May 2004. It repealed almost all of the existing statute law in relation to sexual offences.

The SOA 2003 removed the element of consent from many offences, so that only the act itself and the age of the complainant has to be proved. These offences include those in which the complainant is:

  1. •

    a child under 16 (including under 13)

  2. •

    a child under 18 having sexual relations with persons in a position of trust

  3. •

    a child under 18 involved with family members over 18

  4. •

    a person with a mental disorder impeding choice

  5. •

    a person with a mental disorder who are induced threatened or deceived, and

  6. •

    a person with a mental disorder who have sexual relations with care workers.

The offences where consent must be proved are rape, assault by penetration, sexual assault and causing a person to engage in sexual activity (SOA 2003, ss 1–4).

There are three main provisions in the SOA 2003 relating to consent:

  1. •

    the statutory definition of consent

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate Crime News

Trading standards prosecutions round-up—25 July 2025

A round-up of the latest trading standards prosecutions, including a market trader prosecuted for selling unsafe electrical products.

Health and safety prosecution round-up—25 July 2025

A round-up of the latest health and safety prosecutions, including a grocery wholesaler fined £1m after a worker was fatally injured when trapped between a reversing HGV and a wall as well as an airport company fined after a worker died when a corroded guardrail gave way causing him to fall from height.

CMA warns 54 firms over non-compliance with fake reviews guidance

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced the results of its latest compliance review into online consumer reviews, following a three-month adjustment period after issuing new guidance in April 2025. The review assessed whether over 100 businesses had implemented appropriate policies to prevent fake and misleading reviews. As a result, the CMA has contacted 54 businesses to raise concerns about non-compliance, urging them to update their practices. To support compliance, the regulator will hold a webinar on 4 September, marking a shift in its approach from support to enforcement.

OFSI updates general guidance on UK financial sanctions

The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has updated its general guidance on UK financial sanctions to include Designated Money Service Businesses as a licensing ground under section 6.6. This licensing ground permits OFSI to issue licences that allow funds to be returned to non-designated persons from designated Money Service Businesses, provided specific conditions are met.

View Corporate Crime by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Defences in driving cases

Defences in driving casesDefendant to raise their defenceA number of defences may apply in road traffic cases. These include:•automatism•insanity•duress and necessity, and•the 'hip flask' defenceWhen the defendant relies on a specific defence, they must place sufficient evidence before the court to

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasons

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasonsWhat are special reasons in driving sentencing?Special reasons are a category of mitigating arguments that can: •prevent a defendant from being disqualified from driving or reduce the length of a driving disqualification or•prevent a defendant from

Intentional harassment, alarm or distress

Intentional harassment, alarm or distressThis Practice Note explains the offence of causing intentional harassment, alarm or distress contrary to section 4A of the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986), alongside the lesser offence of causing harassment, alarm or distress under POA 1986, s 5. It sets out

Possession of controlled drugs

Possession of controlled drugsElements of the offence of possession of controlled drugsIt is an offence for a person to have a controlled drug in their possession.The prosecution has to prove, to the criminal standard (see Practice Note: Burden and standard of proof in criminal proceedings),
Defences in driving cases

Defences in driving cases

Defences in driving casesDefendant to raise their defenceA number of defences may apply in road traffic cases. These include:•automatism•insanity•duress and necessity, and•the 'hip flask' defenceWhen the defendant relies on a specific defence, they must place sufficient evidence before the court to

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasons

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasons

Sentencing for road traffic offences—special reasonsWhat are special reasons in driving sentencing?Special reasons are a category of mitigating arguments that can: •prevent a defendant from being disqualified from driving or reduce the length of a driving disqualification or•prevent a defendant from

Intentional harassment, alarm or distress

Intentional harassment, alarm or distress

Intentional harassment, alarm or distressThis Practice Note explains the offence of causing intentional harassment, alarm or distress contrary to section 4A of the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986), alongside the lesser offence of causing harassment, alarm or distress under POA 1986, s 5. It sets out

Possession of controlled drugs

Possession of controlled drugs

Possession of controlled drugsElements of the offence of possession of controlled drugsIt is an offence for a person to have a controlled drug in their possession.The prosecution has to prove, to the criminal standard (see Practice Note: Burden and standard of proof in criminal proceedings),