Legal News

Dilapidations—replacement of carpet tiles was a permitted internal alteration

Published on: 21 April 2016
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Dilapidations—replacement of carpet tiles was a permitted internal alteration
  • Original news
  • What were the issues involved?
  • What did the Court of Appeal decide?
  • Did it matter whether the carpet tiles were landlord fixtures or landlord’s fittings?
  • What did the court decide was the correct date for quantifying the landlord’s loss in the dilapidations claim?
  • What are the implications of the decision?

Article summary

Property analysis: The Court of Appeal decided that carpet tiles were landlord’s fixtures, despite having been re-laid at the start of the term at the tenant’s cost. The tenant was not in breach of covenant in replacing them as this amounted to a permitted internal non-structural alteration. In addition, the tenant was not liable, under the dilapidations provisions, for a void period which was due to the landlord’s commercial decision to delay the remedial works further. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents