Legal News

Approved inspector did not owe duty under Defective Premises Act (Herons Court v Heronslea)

Published on: 29 January 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Approved inspector did not owe duty under Defective Premises Act (Herons Court v Heronslea)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court struck out a claim against a building regulations approved inspector, rejecting an argument that it owed a duty of care under the Defective Premises Act 1972 (DPA 1972) in relation to defective works. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents