Table of contents
- Original news
- What is the background to this case?
- What were the key issues before the court?
- How did the court approach the somewhat complicated issue of costs in this matter?
- What is the significance of this decision?
Article summary
Family analysis: Ian Karsten QC, retired circuit judge, explains that H v Dent serves as a helpful warning to litigants in person of the costs consequences of misconceived applications and that even litigants in person must fully comply with procedural requirements.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial