Evidence and procedure

Evidence in private law children proceedings

There are three forms of evidence:

•
oral evidence by witnesses—note that the court may allow a witness to give evidence through a video link or by other means
•
documentary evidence, such as statements, reports, photographs and case records
•
real evidence, such as a site visit or marks on a person’s body

Under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 22 the court is given wide powers to control the way in which evidence is given. It may give directions as to:

•
the issues on which it requires evidence
•
the nature of the evidence that it requires to decide those issues, and
•
the way in which the evidence is placed before it

It may exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.

A child’s unsworn evidence is admissible if they understand the duty to tell the truth and they have adequate understanding.

The general rule is that all competent witnesses can be compelled to give evidence. Refusal to be sworn, or refusal to answer questions, is contempt of court. The court has a residual

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

House of Commons Justice Committee to examine reform of the Family Court

The House of Commons Justice Committee has confirmed that it will question the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, and the Domestic Abuse Commissioner for England and Wales, Dame Nicole Jacobs, during an evidence session in Parliament on 28 October 2025 at 2:30pm, examining reform of the Family Court. The discussion is expected to focus on recent reforms aimed at tackling delays and backlogs, early interventions and mediation, reforms relating to domestic abuse, problem solving courts, as well as data and digitalisation in the Family Court. The Chief Executives of the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) (Jacky Tiotto) and the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (Lisa Harker) will also appear before the committee.

Choice of location for brain-stem death testing is a best interests decision (NHS Trust v DT)

Private client analysis: The Court of Protection held that the location of brain stem death testing must be determined according to the patient’s best interests under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Where a viable option exists for testing abroad, treating doctors must consider evidence of the patient’s wishes, cultural connections and religious beliefs. The court authorised transfer to Country W for testing despite medical risks, given compelling evidence of the patient’s connection there. While narrow in application due to the requirement for private funding, the judgment provides guidance on balancing clinical considerations against cultural and religious factors in determining testing location. Practical implications written by Victoria Butler-Cole KC of 39 Essex Chambers.

Family weekly highlights—23 October 2025

This week's edition of the Family weekly highlights includes details of the speech by the Master of the Rolls addressing AI adoption in the legal profession and digital assets jurisdiction alignment. Recent judgments on gender recognition certificates, cost orders, fact-finding hearings addressing abuse allegations, deeds of revocation replacing a pre-nuptial agreement and applications for summary return orders are also considered. Two new Practice Notes on the procedure for reporting restriction orders and notifying the media via the Press Association Injunction Applications Alert Service have also been added to the media access and transparency subtopic.

MoJ announces plan to repeal presumption of parental involvement from Children Act 1989

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced plans to repeal the presumption of parental involvement from sections 1(2A), (2B) and (6) of the Children Act 1989, following publication of a comprehensive review on 22 October 2025. The current provisions require courts to presume in child arrangements and certain private law children proceedings that parental involvement will further a child's welfare unless evidence suggests risk of harm. The review, launched in November 2020 following a recommendation from the Harm Panel Report, examined how courts apply these sections and their impact on children's welfare. The MoJ published a final report alongside supporting research including a literature review, qualitative research on Black, Asian and minority ethnic parents' experiences, and analysis of unpublished court judgments. The government will legislate to repeal the presumption when Parliamentary time allows, with the change intended to prioritise children's safety in family court proceedings.