Evidence and procedure

Evidence in private law children proceedings

There are three forms of evidence:

  1. oral evidence by witnesses—note that the court may allow a witness to give evidence through a video link or by other means

  2. documentary evidence, such as statements, reports, photographs and case records

  3. real evidence, such as a site visit or marks on a person’s body

Under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 22 the court is given wide powers to control the way in which evidence is given. It may give directions as to:

  1. the issues on which it requires evidence

  2. the nature of the evidence that it requires to decide those issues, and

  3. the way in which the evidence is placed before it

It may exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.

A child’s unsworn evidence is admissible if they understand the duty to tell the truth and they have adequate understanding.

The general rule is that all competent witnesses can be compelled to give evidence. Refusal to be sworn, or refusal to answer questions, is contempt of court. The court has a residual

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Cafcass guidance on conflicting assessments in public law cases

The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published new guidance for local authorities and Cafcass for cases where the views of the children’s guardian (and therefore their independent advice to the court) and the assessment of a local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer fundamentally differ on the final care plan or interim arrangements for a child. The guidance applies to all children in care and supervision order applications under section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and deprivation of liberty applications. The guidance sets out the process that should be followed at any point during proceedings where a divergence arises and should be completed before final recommendations are submitted to court. The guidance requires that a pre-final hearing meeting be convened to identify and document the points of difference for the court. It includes suggestions for structuring the pre-final hearing meeting, a template agenda and a template for sharing the agreed rationale with the court. The guidance is not intended to be used to agree a joint position, rather to make sure that recommendations to court include a clear explanation about why the children’s guardian, the local authority social worker and/or the independent reviewing officer have reached fundamentally different positions. The explanation must set out what the points of difference are so that the judge in the case can better understand these. It remains for the court to decide what is safe and in the best interests of the child.

View Family by content type :

Popular documents