Child arrangements orders

Section 8(1) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) defines a child arrangements order (CAO) as an order relating to:

•
whom a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact with, and
•
when a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact with any person

See: Child arrangements orders—client guide.

Child arrangements orders—regulating living arrangements

A CAO may regulate with whom a child is to live and when a child is to live with any person (this covers those matters formerly contained within a residence order). A CAO does not determine the location where the child is to live.

See Practice Note: Child arrangements orders—residence.

The order may be made in favour of more than one person and arrangements as to where the child is to live may be shared.

See Practice Note: Child arrangements orders that provide for a child to live with two or more persons who do not live together.

When making a CAO, the child's welfare is the court's paramount consideration. The court must take into

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Family Division launches consultation on revised court allocation guidance

The Family Division has opened a public consultation on comprehensively revised allocation and gatekeeping guidance for family courts. The new draft guidance, approved by the President of the Family Division, combines public and private law cases into a single document, introduces specific provisions for magistrates' case allocation, and incorporates adoption cases previously only referenced in the Family Court (Composition and Distribution of Business Rules) 2014. The revision follows work by the Family Magistrates Working Group, established in February 2024, to review existing allocation procedures. The consultation runs from 1 September to 4pm on 10 October 2025.

Family weekly highlights—28 August 2025

This week's edition of the Family weekly highlights includes details of the Family Public Law release notes updating Form C110a case name section. Analyses of a rare High Court decision regarding sham trusts and deprivation of liberty orders and choice of accommodation are included. Judgments on summary return orders under the 1980 Hague Convention are also considered.

High Court confirms deprivation of liberty order cannot compel choice of accommodation (Kent County Council v The Mother and others)

Local Government analysis: The High Court dismissed the local authority’s application to deprive a 17-year-old child’s liberty for a further six months to compel their choice of accommodation. The court affirmed that ‘section 20 accommodation is not intended to be used coercively’ and determined the local authority had sought ‘to take a young person into care when the statutory scheme does not permit them to do so’. This case provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal principles and relevant case law concerning sections 20 and 100 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), re-affirms the importance of obtaining valid and informed parental consent with reference to section 20 accommodation, and provides a working analysis of the ‘best interests’ decision regarding depriving a child of their liberty. Written by Nicola Wheater, associate at HCR Law.

Family Public Law (FPL) release notes updating Form C110a case name section

The HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) FPL service team commissioned user research to understand how the Form C110a application journey may be improved. The design changes are being released in stages, with a release note to accompany each change. As part of the user research, the judiciary requested that case names be standardised and a standardised naming convention has been approved by the FPL judicial working group with a release date of 28 August 2025.