Grandparents

Grandparents

Grandparents—child arrangements orders

The Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) does not include provisions that are specifically addressed to grandparents. In the event that difficulties arise in a grandparent seeing or otherwise having contact with their grandchild, possibly following the breakdown in the relationship between the grandchild's parents, and if mediation has been unsuccessful, they may consider making an application for a child arrangements order (CAO) providing for contact.

See Practice Notes: Child arrangements orders—contact and Grandparents and children proceedings.

In the majority of cases before they are able to make such an application they must first obtain permission (leave) from the court to do so.

Applications for permission to start proceedings are governed by the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 18 and the corresponding FPR 2010, PD18A.

See Practice Notes: Permission to apply for a section 8 order, Grandparents and children proceedings— Applications by grandparents for child arrangements orders and FPR 2010, Part 18 applications—procedure.

Note that attendance at a family mediation information and assessment meeting (MIAM) is compulsory before an application in private law proceedings relating

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

MAC publishes family visa financial requirements review

The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has published its report on the minimum income requirement (MIR) for the partner migration route recommending that the MIR is not matched to the skilled worker route and making recommendations for different calculations that could be used instead and recommendations to improve the way the MIR is evidenced. This news piece sets out the key points in the report.

Family weekly highlights—5 June 2025

This week's edition of the Family weekly highlights includes analysis of a decision concerning the additional considerations for older intended parents considering international surrogacy. Recent judgments on domestic abuse, applications to set aside return orders and assessment of a solicitor’s conduct where there were issues of client capacity are also included.

Additional considerations for older intended parents considering international surrogacy (Mr and Mrs K v Mr and Mrs Z)

Family analysis: In Mr and Mrs K v Mr and Mrs Z the court considered an application for a parental order by the intended parents, (the applicants), who were both aged 72 at the time of their application. The child had been born via a surrogacy arrangement in California. While all elements of section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA 2008) criteria had been met, Mrs Justice Knowles expressed her concern, at the first hearing, that the applicant’s statements did not sufficiently detail the arrangements for the child’s care should they die or lose capacity during the child’s minority. The court was required to consider the child’s lifelong welfare interests when deciding whether to make a parental order and was obliged to examine carefully what arrangements had been made to secure the child’s welfare should incapacity or death befall either of the applicants. Natalie Sutherland, partner and head of Modern Families at Burgess Mee Family Law considers the decision.

Family weekly highlights—29 May 2025

This week's edition of the Family weekly highlights includes analysis of the implications of the Family Justice Council guidance on covert recordings in children proceedings. Recent judgments on adoption, anonymisation and an application to vary a transparency order and the Court of Appeal’s consideration of an appeal against a summary return order are also included.