Home / Arbitration / Arbitration under the Arbitration Act 1996 / Jurisdiction and applicable law

Legal News

Co-operation between Commercial Court and DIFC Courts

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 26 February 2013
Published by a LexisNexis Arbitration expert

Article summary

A Memorandum of Guidance was signed by the DIFC and English Commercial Courts on 23 January 2013 to promote a mutual understanding of their laws and judicial process in the enforcement of money judgments.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

The seat of the arbitration

The seat of the arbitrationThis Practice Note considers the key concept of the seat of an arbitration, with a particular focus on the law of England and Wales and Northern Ireland (England and English are used as shorthand throughout). Practice Note: Choosing the seat of arbitration may also be of

Remedies for breach of the arbitration agreement

Remedies for breach of the arbitration agreementSTOP PRESS: This Practice Note is currently Under Review in light of the new Arbitration Act 2025. For further information on when the new act comes into force see Practice Note: When will the Arbitration Act 2025 come into force?An arbitration

Arbitration agreements—the doctrine of separability (England and Wales)

Arbitration agreements—the doctrine of separability (England and Wales)This Practice Note considers the doctrine of separability under the law of England and Wales (England and English are used as shorthand throughout). This Practice Note should be read in conjunction with Practice Note:

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitration

Ad hoc arbitration—an introduction to the key features of ad hoc arbitrationAn ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support