Home / Property / Leasing property / Leasehold enfranchisement

Legal News

Clarification of ‘qualifying tenant’ for right to manage

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 27 February 2013
Published by a LexisNexis Property expert

Table of contents

  • Original news
  • What is the right to manage?
  • What were the key features of the case?
  • Why did the LVT decide that the company was not entitled to the right to manage?
  • Why did the tribunal allow the RTM company’s appeal?
  • How does the decision assist lawyers ?

Article summary

Property analysis: What is the proper application of the criteria for a ‘qualifying tenant’ for the purposes of the right to manage regime?

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

4 News
View More
8 Q&As
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 News
View More
8 Q&As
View More

Popular documents

Are there any circumstances in which ‘irrevocable authority’ can be revoked? The context here the

Are there any circumstances in which ‘irrevocable authority’ can be revoked? The context here the landlord will confirm in a document that they give their irrevocable authority for the tenant to complete a document, which the landlord will have previously executed in escrow. Is there any risk of the

Concurrent leases

Concurrent leasesThis Practice Note explains:•what a concurrent lease is•when it is commonly used•who can enforce (and benefit from) the covenants in the existing lease(s), and•key differences between a concurrent lease and a headlease out of which underleases are grantedIt also looks at key terms

What are the key differences between the definitions of ‘group company’ in the Landlord and Tenant Act

What are the key differences between the definitions of ‘group company’ in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) and in the Companies Act 2006? Would the definition of group company in LTA 1954 catch a company held by the same ultimate holding company but not the same immediate parent

Implied tenancies at will—holding over after expiry of a contracted-out lease or occupation before

Implied tenancies at will—holding over after expiry of a contracted-out lease or occupation before completion of a new lease [Archived]ARCHIVEDWhere a tenant holds over after the expiry of an existing tenancy that does not benefit from security of tenure, it is an open question whether the