Table of contents
- Practical implications
- Court details
- Facts
- Judgment
Article summary
Cooke J found that the parties to a contract between a cricketer and the relevant cricket board provided for arbitration despite the agreement not containing the word ‘arbitration’ or ‘arbitrator’. He applied the test set out by Thomas J in Walkinshaw despite that test being obiter.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial