Grounds for refusal and re-entry bans

The rules set out in the Immigration Rules, Part 9 are a list of common grounds on which an application for entry clearance, permission to enter or permission to stay can be refused, which are in addition to any grounds for refusal included in the specific requirements set out in the Parts and Appendices of the Immigration Rules covering the relevant immigration route. Part 9 also includes grounds for the cancellation of existing entry clearance or permission.

Part 9 was restructured and rewritten in Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules HC 813, which came into force for applications decided on or after 1 December 2020. Originally known as the ‘General grounds for refusal’, the Part is now titled ‘Grounds for refusal’, although ‘Suitability’ is now the term that seems to be used as an umbrella term for these matters. These changes were made as part of the Home Office’s Simplification of the Immigration Rules project, further to recommendations of the Law Commission.

The broad intention for the Part is to set out in one place common grounds which will apply across all routes in the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Immigration News

Sudden end of right of appeal for Article 8 upgrade and long residence refusals

The Home Office has updated it's 'Rights of Appeal caseworker guidance' to say that the Home Office will no longer be issuing appealable refusal decisions where a person already has leave to remain in the UK. Previously the guidance still provided for a right of appeal if the person did not already have leave to remain on human rights grounds. A common scenario where this arose was appeals against a refusal on the ten-year long residence settlement route. Now if a person already holds any form of leave to remain (except 3C leave), the Home Office will not issue an appealable refusal decision and the only remedy would be judicial review, unless the refusal attracts a right of administrative review (which would not usually arise for human rights applications).

Research briefing on possible impact of 2025 Immigration White Paper

The House of Commons Library has published a research briefing which considers various questions around the policy changes announced in the May 2025 Immigration White Paper, Restoring control over the immigration system. Some proposals have already taken effect, but many remain subject to consultation.

Briefing on Afghan asylum seekers and refugees in the UK

The Migration Observatory has updated its briefing which examines the migration of Afghan asylum seekers and refugees to the UK. The briefing outlines the contemporary landscape of Afghan migration to the UK, emphasising the interplay between resettlement schemes, asylum flows and global displacement. By June 2025, around 35,700 people had been resettled under the UK’s three dedicated Afghan humanitarian visa routes (ARAP, ACRS and the recently disclosed ARR). Of those, ARAP accounted for 53 percent, ACRS for 37 percent and ARR for 10 percent. Approximately 97 percent of beneficiaries were Afghan nationals. The ARR scheme itself had resettled around 3,400 people as of 30 June 2025, with expectations of a total 6,900 by scheme close.

Labour government’s migration pledges examined

The Migration Observatory has updated its analysis on the Labour government’s migration pledges against recent data, noting that many observed trends stem from Conservative-era policies rather than Labour’s own initiatives. On net migration, levels peaked at 906,000 in June 2023 before falling by 52% to 431,000 in 2024. This decline largely reflects visa restrictions introduced under the Conservatives, though the Labour government has retained them and announced further tightening in its May 2025 Immigration White Paper. Labour’s pledge to reduce reliance on overseas workers builds on restrictions introduced in 2024, including higher salary thresholds and dependants limits. It has gone further in government by closing the care-worker route to new entrants, raising skill thresholds, and introducing temporary shortage lists and stricter language requirements.