Applying from overseas

In many cases, nationals of countries other than the UK and Ireland are required to obtain prior permission under the Immigration Rules before they can travel to the UK. This prior permission is often issued in the form of an entry clearance, which can be issued as a vignette (stamp) in a passport, or in some cases as a digital eVisa. The Home Office is also rolling out a separate system of prior permission to travel for visits and short-term stays for Creative Workers by those who require leave to enter but do not require to obtain prior entry clearance (ie non-visa nationals who require leave to enter). This is in the form of an Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA). See: Permission to travel to the UK—overview.

For details of the ETA scheme, and how to make an application, see Practice Note: The Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) scheme.

Entry clearance should be applied for either in the applicant's home country or another country in which they are lawfully resident, although there are some exceptions to this general rule including applications for an EU Settlement Scheme

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Immigration News

UKICE blog asserts that Reform UK’s ILR abolition proposal faces public opposition

UK in a Changing Europe (UKICE) has published a blog by Rob Ford, Senior Fellow, UKICE and Professor of Politics,  University of Manchester arguing that Reform UK’s proposal to abolish indefinite leave to remain (ILR) and require migrants to reapply for visas every five years runs contrary to public opinion and risks a public outcry.  The blog explains that ILR is generally obtained after years of work or family sponsorship, at which point migrants gain the same rights to welfare benefits as UK citizens rights, and it is these rights Reform UK seeks to restrict. The blog asserts that Reform UK’s proposed exclusion of migrants from ILR and welfare benefits would be an unpopular policy. In support of this, Ford points to NatCen panel data from early 2024 which found that 84% of respondents supported giving tax-paying migrants equal welfare access within five years, with 65% favouring an even shorter three-year period and only 3% supporting permanent exclusion. The blog also highlights a survey by British Social Attitudes which compares 2013 and 2024 views on qualification periods for welfare access. The survey results show an increase in support of a qualification period of five years or less for migrants from 82% in 2013 to 84% in 2024.  The data provided, Ford argues, shows that despite over a decade of campaigning for a stricter migration policy, public opinion on access to welfare benefits for settled migrants remains consistent. Ford notes that while no polling exists on revoking rights already granted, Reform UK’s proposal to end ILR and revoke the welfare and security rights of settled migrants would likely be even more unpopular. Ford concludes that public opinion consistently values migrants’ economic contributions and supports fair access once settlement conditions are met.

View Immigration by content type :

Popular documents