Applying in the UK

Applying in the UK

The terms ‘leave to enter/remain’ and ‘permission to enter/stay’ are used interchangeably. The word ‘permission’ replaces ‘leave’ in the Immigration Rules for simplified routes, but the former term is still used in other categories of stay and the relevant legislation.

In-country applications

A person subject to immigration control in the UK is generally required to make an application in the UK if:

•
they wish to stay beyond the date their current leave/permision expires, including when they are eligible for settlement (indefinite leave to remain)
•
their circumstances change so that they no longer meet the requirements of their current immigration route and wish to remain in the UK in a different route
•
they wish to change their immigration route, or
•
they wish to regularise their immigration status, eg they have overstayed their previous leave or entered the UK illegally

Where a person already has leave to enter or leave to remain, any application to extend, reduce or otherwise alter this leave is termed under the Immigration Rules an application to ‘vary’ their leave.

In-country applications are decided by the Home Office ...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Immigration News

UKICE highlights post-Brexit rights challenges for Britons in the EU

UK in a Changing Europe (UKICE) has published a blog by Professor Michaela Benson examining the long-term effects of Brexit on the estimated 1.2 million British citizens residing in the EU, EEA and EFTA states. As many transition from temporary to permanent residence under the Withdrawal Agreement, disparities in national implementation and administrative procedures have created uncertainty and risk of exclusion, particularly for vulnerable individuals. The blog identifies inconsistent registration systems, gaps in support, and difficulties in proving status as key issues, noting that the absence of a unified oversight mechanism, such as the UK's Independent Monitoring Authority for EU nationals, exacerbates the problem. Benson calls for renewed systematic research to better understand the evolving experiences of this population, and draws attention to her own survey, which has a deadline of 11 July 2025.

Immigration weekly highlights—26 June 2025

Welcome to the 26 June 2025 highlights from the Immigration team, which provides links to key news stories from the last week, as well as a round-up of new and updated content in Immigration.

RFUK report reveals impacts of increased spouse income requirements

Reunite Families UK (RFUK) has released a comprehensive study examining the adverse effects of the UK’s spouse and partner migration rules from 2022 to 2025. The analysis is based on 745 survey responses, focus groups, and interviews with affected individuals, including children. The study focuses on the impact of the Minimum Income Requirement (MIR) on families, children and society. This includes the impact of the increase in the MIR from £18,600 to £29,000 in April 2024. The report was prepared prior to the publication of the Migration Advisory Committee’s (MAC) review of the partner financial requirements on 10 June 2025.

Statement of changes in Immigration Rules, HC 836—analysis

Immigration analysis: the Lexis+® UK Immigration team outlines the main changes set out in HC 836, published on 24 June 2025. The most significant news in this Statement is the change to the continuous residence requirement for the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS), so that applicants with pre-settled status will no longer need to have been continuously resident in the UK since the end of the transition period to remain eligible for settled status, if they have been resident in the UK for 30 months in the past 60 months. This will resolve a longstanding concern for many EEA citizens/family members who had been unaware of the previous requirement. There are also some corrections to the Private Life route which will assist child applicants, and correct omissions made on simplification. Otherwise, the Statement is largely made up of technical amendments and non-substantive drafting changes. There are no changes made to the Skilled Worker or Child Student routes, as had been anticipated from the Immigration White Paper and to correct errors in the last Statement of Changes (HC 733).