Sabre Corporation v CMA [Archived]

Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert
Practice notes

Sabre Corporation v CMA [Archived]

Published by a LexisNexis Competition expert

Practice notes
imgtext

CASE HUB

ARCHIVED—this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the judgment of 21 May 2021; it is no longer maintained.

See further, timeline and commentary.

Case facts

OutlineAn appeal by Sabre Corporation against the Competition and Markets Authority’s decision of 9 April 2020 prohibiting the anticipated acquisition by Sabre Corporation of Farelogix Inc.
Latest development On 21 May 2021, the CAT issued its judgment in which it dismissed the appeal in its entirety. In particular, the CAT held (amongst other things) that the CMA: (i) had not erred in asserting jurisdiction over the proposed transaction on the basis of the share of supply test under section 23 of the Enterprise Act 2002; and (ii) has broad discretion to apply the test as it sees fit, including by reference to products’ functionality.
Parties• Sabre Corporation (Sabre): Sabre is a US-based company, headquartered in Southlake, Texas, that provides travel technology services.• Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
BackgroundThe transactionOn 14 November 2018, Sabre announced that it had agreed to acquire Farelogix Inc.
Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Competition and Markets Authority definition
What does Competition and Markets Authority mean?

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is the UK's unified competition body, and with effect from 1 April 2014, brings together the Competition Commission (CC) and the competition and certain consumer functions of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT).

Popular documents