The following Corporate Crime guidance note Produced in partnership with 18 Red Lion Court provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
It is an offence to:
in the production
of a controlled drug
Production of a controlled drug is an offence which is triable either way. It can therefore be dealt with in either the magistrates’ or Crown Courts.
Case law is clear that in order to obtain a conviction for this offence the Crown must prove that the defendant played an identifiable role in the production of the drug (R v Farr  Crim LR 745 (not reported by LexisNexis®)).
The leading case on this point is the case of Farr. The defendant allowed two people to use his kitchen to produce heroin; there was no prior agreement. The Court of Appeal quashed his conviction, holding that there had to be some identifiable participation in the process of producing a controlled drug; on the facts of the case, nothing more than passive presence could be established. The appropriate charge in these circumstances would have been under section 8 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA 1971), (allowing premises to be used for production of the drug).
A case charged as an agreement to aid and abet the production of cannabis (eg where the defendant is the owner of a
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234