The following Corporate Crime practice note produced in partnership with Áine Kervick of Kingsley Napley and Will Hayes of Kingsley Napley provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The concept of privilege against self-incrimination, which is commonly referred to as one distinct protection, actually arises from a number of different protections for defendants and witnesses at common law which are 'concerned with the protection of citizens against the abuse of powers by those investigating crimes'.
Those disparate protections can be loosely categorised as:
a privilege against self-incrimination for witnesses in criminal, civil or other non-judicial investigative proceedings (such as coroners' inquests)
the right of a defendant not to give evidence at trial; and
the right to silence of a suspect during a pre-trial criminal investigation
As set out below, the privilege is not absolute and statute has encroached on these various protections in a number of ways.
The privilege against self-incrimination is a long-established common law privilege. The principle derives from common law as a reaction to prisoners being tortured into answering self-incriminating questions which would lead to their conviction in the Star Chamber.
It was summarised in 1942 in Blunt v Park Lane Hotel Ltd:
'The rule is that no one is bound to answer any question if the answer thereto would, in the opinion of the judge, have a tendency to expose the deponent to any criminal charge, penalty or forfeiture which the judge regards as reasonably likely to be preferred or sued for'.
At common law,
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Contract variationThis Practice Note summarises the law, guidance and practice relating to the variation of contracts and deeds. It explains how a contract or deed can be varied in writing, orally or by conduct, and also considers unilateral variation, waiver and sustained minor breach. It sets out
Hearsay evidence in civil litigationThis Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.This Practice
Provisional sumsWhat are provisional sums?There is no precise standard definition of provisional sum but it is generally understood to refer to an amount inserted in a bill of quantities, or contract sum analysis, to cover certain items of work that cannot be accurately defined, detailed or valued
Voluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element for murder) but which are reduced to manslaughter because of one of the three special defences (loss of control, diminished
0330 161 1234