Áine Kervick#2453

Áine Kervick

Áine Kervick is an associate in the criminal litigation team and acts on a wide range of white collar and general criminal cases. She joined Kingsley Napley in 2014 and qualified as a solicitor in 2016.

She currently acts for suspects and witnesses in respect of investigations brought by the SFO, CMA and DoJ in relation to bribery and corruption and cartel investigations. She was part of the team working on the LIBOR II trial which involved allegations of a conspiracy to manipulate the LIBOR rate in which the client was acquitted after a trial lasting nearly 4 months.

Áine has a particular interest in the international dimension of criminal cases and advises individuals in respect of extradition requests. She is also experienced in acting for individuals in internal investigations with a focus on legal professional privilege in criminal investigations.

Contributed to

5

Issues of privilege in cross-border criminal investigations
Issues of privilege in cross-border criminal investigations
Practice Notes

This Practice Note explains the issues relating to legal professional privilege which arise in cross-border criminal investigations and the practical steps which should be taken to protect legal professional privilege in multi-jurisdictional criminal investigations.

Maintaining privilege during criminal investigations
Maintaining privilege during criminal investigations
Practice Notes

This Practice Note explains how legal professional privilege (LPP) can be maintained for clients during the course of a criminal investigation including during dawn raids, during regulator searches and during interviews under caution and compelled interviews. The steps to be taken during internal investigations to preserve privilege (legal advice privilege and litigation privilege) are highlighted and privilege issues to consider when advising and preparing internal investigation reports into suspected criminal breaches are also included.

Privilege against self-incrimination
Privilege against self-incrimination
Practice Notes

This Practice Note explains the scope of privilege against self-incrimination. It covers when privilege against self-incrimination may be raised in criminal proceedings and coroner inquests and the practical considerations when advising clients during criminal investigations, interviews and during criminal hearings.

Could without prejudice documents in civil proceedings be seized and used by regulators in regulatory or
Could without prejudice documents in civil proceedings be seized and used by regulators in regulatory or
Q&A

This Q&A considers whether without prejudice documents in civil proceedings could be seized and used by regulators in regulatory or criminal proceedings (using their powers of compulsion) or if such documents will be protected by privilege.

Privilege in criminal investigations—checklist
Privilege in criminal investigations—checklist
Checklists

This Checklist explains the steps which should be considered in order to maintain legal professional privilege (LPP) during a criminal investigation. It includes issues relating to legal advice privilege and litigation privilege to consider at the outset of an internal investigation into suspected criminal offences as well as issues of legal privilege which might arise during an internal investigation including issues relating to document management, correspondence with legal representatives and instructions to/from, and communications with, third parties.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2016

Membership

  • Young Fraud Lawyers Association
  • Defence Extradition Lawyers' Forum
  • London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association

Education

  • BPP London (LPC)
  • University of Cambridge (MPhil in Criminological Research)
  • University of Trinity College Dublin (LLB Law)

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.