Legal privilege in criminal cases

Legal professional privilege in criminal proceedings

Legal professional privilege (LPP) is a fundamental right. It embodies the need to allow people to speak freely to a lawyer without fear that the information they are imparting will be divulged in breach of their confidence. The effect of a document attracting LPP is that it cannot be forcibly disclosed to any other party outside of the privileged relationship that exists between lawyer and client. It is an important safeguard. Legal advisers have a duty to protect their client’s privilege and not unintentionally waive it. Practitioners therefore require a sound understanding of how the principles of LPP apply in criminal investigations and prosecutions.

This is particularly so, if an external lawyer is approached to conduct an internal investigation on behalf of a corporate client into suspected criminal offences, since they will be advising that client on the merits of a self-report to the likes of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the National Crime Agency (NCA) or the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) or Environment Agency (EA). Practice

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Corporate Crime News

OFSI publishes General Licence INT/2025/7598960 and updates UK Financial Sanctions FAQs

The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has published General Licence INT/2025/7598960 under regulation 64 of the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, SI 2019/855. The licence permits the continuation of business activities involving Rosneft Deutschland GmbH, RN Refining and Marketing GmbH and their subsidiaries. OFSI has also updated its UK Financial Sanctions FAQs, adding FAQ 169, which clarifies that business operations with these entities may continue as normal in relation to UK financial sanctions, provided they comply with the terms of General Licence INT/2025/7598960.

MPs debate Independent Review of Criminal Courts

During a Westminster Hall debate MPs discussed the Independent Review of the Criminal Courts (Part 1), led by Sir Jeremy Wright KC. The debate centred on Sir Brian Leveson’s recommendations to address the mounting crisis in the criminal courts of England and Wales. Concerns were raised about proposals to restrict jury trials, with Justice Select Committee chair Andy Slaughter warning of potential threats to defendants’ rights. Ayoub Khan highlighted the risk of eroding public trust, particularly among marginalised communities and called for evidence-based, reversible reforms. Shadow Justice Minister Dr. Kieran Mullan and Liberal Democrat spokesperson Jess Brown-Fuller also opposed limiting jury trials, describing them as essential to justice.

Insolvency Service reports director imprisonment for BBL misrepresentation

The Insolvency Service has reported that Craig Smith, director of C.A.S. Property Maintenance (Midlands) Limited, has bee sentenced to two years and one month in prison at Wolverhampton Crown Court for fraud by false representation. Smith fraudulently obtained a £50,000 Covid bounce back loan (BBL) in August 2020 by claiming his annual turnover was £200,000 when it was £33,578. The 42-year-old from Dudley had pleaded guilty to one count of fraud by false representation at Wolverhampton Crown Court on 14 August 2025. Smith resigned as director in July 2021 without filing accounts for the company, which was dissolved in 2022.

FCA publishes guidance on complex financial history and commitment rules

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published its guidance on the application of complex financial history and significant financial commitment rules under Article 18 of the UK version of Regulation (EU) 2019/980, as retained under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This guidance is intended to assist issuers and their advisers in interpreting the UK Listing Rules, Prospectus Regulation Rules, and Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules when preparing a prospectus for equity securities. Issuers are advised to engage with the FCA early in the listing process to discuss judgments about the adequacy of their financial disclosures, particularly where acquisitions or binding agreements may materially affect the issuer’s business. The FCA assesses whether a complex financial history exists based on the accuracy and completeness of the issuer’s financial information, the size and timing of acquisitions, and their relevance to the issuer’s business strategy.

View Corporate Crime by content type :

News