The following Construction practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note explains what liquidated and ascertained damages (LADs/LDs) are and their purpose in a building contract. It considers the difference between liquidated damages and general (or unliquidated) damages and looks at the enforceability of LADs provisions and common grounds for challenging them (including that the clause is a penalty). The Practice Note also looks at how much LADs should be, capping LADs and the risks of inserting ‘nil’ or ‘N/A’ as the amount of LADs.
If the parties to a construction contract agree to liquidated damages, they are agreeing, in advance, to a fixed sum that will be payable as damages in the event that a particular identified breach of contract occurs. Liquidated damages are often also referred to as liquidated and ascertained damages and the acronyms ‘LDs’ and ‘LADs’ are both commonly used to refer to them.
When liability for LADs occurs, they can typically be paid either by the contractor to the employer or they can be deducted by the employer from sums due from it to the contractor.
LADs clauses in a contract must not be such that they amount to a penalty because penalty clauses are (in general) unenforceable. For more on when LADs will be a penalty/unenforceable, see: Clause is a penalty below.
LADs are used for a number of purposes in construction contracts.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principles of the notarial act are that it is:•an act of the notary and not of the parties named in the document•a record of a fact, event or transaction•in the form of a document, notwithstanding the form of the underlying document, fact, event or transactionThe purpose of the notarial act is
You may apply simplified customer due diligence (SDD) measures in relation to particular business relationships or transactions which you determine present a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, having taken into account:•your organisation-wide risk assessment—see Practice Note:
Overlapping insurance policesThere are various reasons why an insured may end up with overlapping insurance cover, whether deliberately or otherwise.Examples include the situation where the insured takes the benefit of other insurance arranged by another party or where, in the commercial world, risk
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.