Damages and exclusions

Due to the nature of construction projects, it is common for parties to raise claims relating to breaches of contract or negligence. As a result, the question of damages for these types of breaches, and how to minimise liability if faced with a claim, is extremely important.

Damages

The normal function of damages for breach of contract or negligence is compensatory—ie the aim is to compensate the innocent party for its true loss and place it in the same position, so far as money can do so, as it would have been in had the contract been performed or, in tort, as if the wrong not been suffered. Notwithstanding this difference in the contractual and tortious measures of damages, in many cases, the same result will follow from the application of either measure.

Practice Note Quantum in construction claims highlights some of the key considerations that parties to construction contracts should consider when formulating the quantum aspects of a claim for damages—including issues of causation and remoteness, the use of global claims, mitigation and betterment, contributory negligence, contractual restrictions or exclusions and supporting quantum

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Construction News

The Building Safety Levy (England) Regulations—a quick guide

Construction analysis: The government laid the draft Building Safety Levy (England) Regulations before parliament on 10 July 2025. The draft regulations, made using powers conferred by the Building Safety Act 2022, propose the introduction of a levy on certain new residential developments. The proceeds will contribute to the costs of remediating building safety defects in England. The regulations prescribe the circumstances in which liability to pay the levy arises, who is liable to pay it, and how it will be calculated. In this article, we set out the context for these regulations, and summarise their key features.

Scottish Government publishes review of building standards verification frameworks

The Scottish Government has published a review of the Building Standards Operating and Performance Frameworks for Verifiers, outlining recommended modifications designed to enhance compliance, following the Phase 2 findings of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry. The frameworks that govern how local authorities verify building standards will be updated from 1 April 2026. Key changes include the introduction of new performance measures, a stronger emphasis on the regulatory function over customer service and the implementation of workforce monitoring requirements. This review is a component of Scotland’s broader building standards system reform programme.

Scottish Government publishes next phase of cladding remediation plan

The Scottish Government's Cladding Remediation Directorate has published an action plan detailing the next phase of its remediation programme through March 2026. The plan allocates £20m for Single Building Assessment (SBA) funding and £10m for fire alarm systems in private buildings. Key measures include launching stage two of the Single Open Call, establishing remediation pathways for buildings taller than 18 metres by October 2025, and setting a deadline of 31 October 2025 for developers to sign the Developer Remediation Contract. The programme aims to ensure equal funding access for both social and private housing sectors.

Enforcing the exclusivity of the supervisory jurisdiction of an arbitration (Star Hydro Power Ltd v National Transmission and Despatch Company Ltd)

Arbitration analysis: The Court of Appeal granted an anti-suit injunction to restrain proceedings in Pakistan intended to undermine an award in a London seated arbitration. The court emphasised the exclusivity of the supervisory jurisdiction of an arbitration for the purposes of a challenge to an award, noting that a ‘challenge’ to an award under the New York Convention is a shield against an application for recognition and enforcement of the award, not a sword with which the award may be cut down. Written by Jennifer Haywood, barrister, arbitrator and mediator at Serle Court.