Termination and suspension

A construction contract may be discharged, terminated or determined in a number ways. These principally include:

  1. by performance

  2. by agreement/release

  3. as a result of a misrepresentation/fraud (see Practice Note: Misrepresentation—rescission as a remedy)

  4. frustration (see Practice Note: Discharge by frustration)

  5. at common law for 'repudiatory' breach of contract ('repudiation') (see Practice Note: Repudiation of contract), or

  6. pursuant to a contractual power to terminate the contract, for example:

    1. for breach of contract

    2. at will

    3. on insolvency (see below)

Practice Note: Termination of a construction contract considers termination of a construction contract at common law for repudiatory breach, and termination by operation of a contractual provision either for breach or at will. See also Practice Note: Material breach in construction contracts, which looks specifically at contractual provisions allowing a party to terminate (or suspend works) for ‘material breach’.

A useful summary of the issues to consider is also available in Checklist: Termination of a construction contract—checklist.

In relation to consultant appointments, see Practice Note: Termination of a consultant's appointment.

Standard

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Construction News

Construction weekly highlights—23 October 2025

This week's edition of Construction weekly highlights includes a Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decision in relation to damages under the Defective Premises Act 1972 (DPA 1972) and the ‘fit for habitation’ standard (Mallas v Persimmon Homes), the Building Safety Regulator (BSR)’s quarterly update on Gateway 2 building control approval applications; a TCC decision where the court refused enforcement of an adjudicator's decision on the basis that the claimant had made a false statement regarding a conflict of interest in its application for the appointment of an adjudicator (RNJM v Purpose Social Homes), guidance from the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE) warning of risks linked to AI use, an analysis of AI’s transformative role in international construction projects and related legal risks, a report from Madrid International Arbitration Center – Ibero-American Arbitration Center (CIAM-CIAR) Working Group on International Arbitration on Expert Determination, a TCC ruling upholding an automatic suspension in a procurement dispute (Involve v DWP), the Scottish Government’s consultation on the proposed revised financial thresholds under the Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014, a call from the Construction Leadership Council (CLC)’s Material Supply Chain Group for government stimulus amid construction market decline and publication of the August 2025 construction output by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

View Construction by content type :

Popular documents