The following Construction Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Q&A considers the following questions:
Can an employer claim liquidated and ascertained damages (LADs) where there is uncertainty around whether the completion date should have been extended as a result of an earlier delay, for which the contractor has made an extension of time (EOT) claim but it hasn't been awarded as the contractor has not yet provided sufficient substantiation? What if there is a cap on liquidated damages which is reached anyway as the contractor is still in delay even if its EOT claim is approved, and is time barred from making a further claim for this second delay?
Subject always to the terms of the specific contract, LADs for delay are normally payable by the contractor in respect of the period starting from the ‘completion date’ (or similar terminology) as defined in the contract until practical completion is achieved. The contract will invariably allow for the completion date to be varied from time to time by the employer or its agent during the course of the project, for example where the contractor is entitled to an EOT.
For example, in the JCT Standard Building Contract 2016:
the completion date is defined as: ‘the Date for Completion of the Wo
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note provides an introduction to intercreditor agreements and their key provisions. This Practice Note:•explains the purpose of having an intercreditor agreement and when an intercreditor agreement would be used instead of a deed of priority or subordination deed•provides links to
This Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions typically found in an escrow
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
Coronavirus (COVID-19): During the current pandemic, legislation and changes to practice and procedure in the courts and tribunals have been introduced, which affect the following:•proceedings for possession•forfeiture of business leases on the grounds of non-payment of rent•a landlord's right to
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.