Q&As

Can a landlord/agent enter the common parts of houses in multiple occupation without notice to carry out repairs or show potential tenants an empty room? Would the position change if some tenants had a joint assured shorthold tenancy for exclusive possession of certain rooms as well as the ability to use common areas?

read titleRead full title
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published by a LexisNexis Local Government expert
Published on: 24 April 2017
imgtext

Although Part 2 of the Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) defines various types of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), the most commonly encountered situation is where a building consists of more than one unit of living accommodation which:

  1. •

    are not self-contained flats

  2. •

    is occupied by persons as their only or main residence, but not as a single household, and

  3. •

    two or more households share one or more basic amenities, by which is meant a toilet, personal washing facilities or cooking facilities

Such accommodation requires a licence under HA 2004 and it is assumed for the purposes of this question that this has happened.

It will readily be seen therefore that where a landlord has a property and grants tenancies of individual rooms to

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:

Popular documents

Demoted tenancies

Demoted tenanciesDemotionA secure tenancy can be demoted to a 12-month probationary tenancy if the tenant has engaged in housing related anti-social conduct or has used the property for unlawful purposes. If a demotion order is granted and the tenant remains in occupation then on a specified date

Did local authority discharge its relief duty and comply with Housing Act 1996 (Moge v London Borough of

Local Government analysis: The issue in this appeal was whether the London Borough of Ealing (‘Ealing’), when seeking to discharge its relief duty under section 189B of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), namely to take reasonable steps to her the appellant secure accommodation, had acted in accordance

Succession to secure tenancy challenge dismissed by the Court of Appeal (Dudley MBC v Mailley)

Local Government analysis: Section 87(b) of the Housing Act 1985 (HA 1985) was not of discriminatory effect in respect of the daughter of a secure tenant by preventing the daughter succeeding to the tenancy on the secure tenant dying while permanently residing at a care home. The daughter could not

Intentional homelessness, affordability and reasonable expenditure (Patel v London Borough of Hackney)

Local Government analysis: Patel v LB Hackney is a Court of Appeal case arising from a section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996) statutory homeless appeal following a decision of intentional homelessness. The appellant had been found to have become homeless intentionally following the loss of