Possession

General rights of all occupiers

A residential occupier is defined in section 1(1) of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 as:

‘a person occupying the premises as a residence, whether under a contract or by virtue of any enactment or rule of law giving him the right to remain in occupation or restricting the right of any other person to recover possession of the premises.’

The basic right of a residential occupier of rented premises is to be safe from unlawful eviction. An action for unlawful eviction arises when an occupier is removed from, or prevented from accessing premises which they are entitled to occupy, without the legally prescribed means being used to evict them. See Practice Note: Unlawful eviction and quiet enjoyment. See also: Unlawful eviction—overview.

However, the procedure to follow in respect of obtaining an order, and the defences available to the tenant in court, will depend on what statutory regime (if any) the tenancy or licence falls under.

Social housing landlords

Since 13 January 2020, social landlords in England and Wales, including a local authority or housing association, can only commence

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Local Government News

Local Government weekly highlights—11 September 2025

This week's edition of Local Government weekly highlights includes: case analysis of R (AA) v Waltham Forest LBC, which sets out that judicial review is correct route to challenge section 189A plans under HA 1996; Chidswell Action Group v Kirklees Council, in which the court quashed planning permission where the section 106 agreement was not published pre-decision and Wild Justice v Pembrokeshire Coast NPA, in which the court quashed planning permission due to the authority's failure to publish a key ecological report. Case reports include R (AN) v Barking and Dagenham LBC, in which the court found the housing assessment breached statutory duties under HA 1996, CA 2004 and EqA 2010; R (Andrew Rickards) v East Hertfordshire DC, in which the court allowed a judicial review challenge of the LA's prior grant of approval to erect Green Belt polytunnels; R (Anaesthetists United Ltd) v GMC, in which the court rejected a judicial review application questioning whether GMC acted lawfully in implementing regulatory powers under Anaesthesia Associates and Physician Associates Order 2024 and A Local Authority v A Mother and others, in which the court rejected the LA care order applications in finding the parents' travel plans did not constitute unreasonable parenting. It also includes Ofsted's announcement of major changes to education inspection frameworks, the Education Committee's launch of an inquiry into early years sector reforms and further updates on Social housing, Healthcare, Public procurement, Education, Governance, Social care and Environmental law and climate change.

View Local Government by content type :

Popular documents