Pilot schemes

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

This topic contains details of pilot schemes that are or have been operated by the civil courts.

Trackers

Practice Note: Tracker—pilot schemes—Dispute Resolution provides a list of relevant pilot schemes which are currently operating in the civil courts. It provides brief details of each pilot scheme and links to Practice Notes and News Analyses for further information.

Practice Note: Dispute Resolution—pilot schemes which have ended provides information on pilot schemes that have ended.

Pilot schemes—current

The following content provides information about pilot schemes currently in operation:

  1. •

    Practice Note: Small claims mediation service—which provides detail on the small claims track automatic referral to mediation pilot scheme under CPR PD 51ZE

  2. •

    Practice Note: Small claims paper determination pilot—CPR PD 51ZC—which contains a pilot scheme to test a procedure which will enable the court to direct that a small claim will be determined without a hearing without requiring the agreement of all parties, as is currently required under CPR 27.10

  3. •

    Practice Notes: Electronic working and CE-File—when and where is CE-File applicable? and Electronic working and CE-File—how to use CE-File—which consider electronic working using CE-File,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Court finds compelling justification to continue injunctions to prevent dangerous car-cruising against persons unknown (Birmingham CC and Wolverhampton CC and others v Persons Unknown)

Local Government analysis: In continuing several local authority injunctions against named defendants and persons unknown for car-cruising and associated nuisance, Mr Justice Ritchie helpfully summarised the proper approach to whether such injunctions as against persons unknown should be continued on a review as prescribed by Wolverhampton City Council & others v London Gypsies and Travellers and others (‘the Wolverhampton case’). The case assimilates the numerous factors to which the court must have regard (and which the parties ought to address in evidence and submissions) by reference to the decisions in Valero Energy Ltd v Persons Unknown, the Wolverhampton case and MBR Acres Ltd and others v McGivern. Written by Stephanie Smith, barrister at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square.

Daughter entitled to sums for caring for her late mother prior to death (Rogers v Wills)

Dispute Resolution analysis: Following a trial, a daughter has been held to be entitled to the receipt of substantial sums from the estate of her late mother pursuant to the terms of a contract made with the late mother for the provision of care in her home. Had the contract not existed, the daughter would, in any event, have been entitled to receive such payment on a restitutionary basis. Written by Phillip Patterson, barrister, Gatehouse Chambers.

Misuse of AI in court and the consequences (Ayinde v Haringey & Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bank)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Divisional Court has ruled on the consequences of misusing artificial intelligence (AI) in court proceedings. Following two referrals arising from actual or suspected misuse of generative AI by lawyers, the court used its inherent powers to enforce the duties owed by lawyers to the court (the Hamid jurisdiction). The judgment provides vitally important guidance to practitioners on their duties to the court and to their professional regulators when using AI. It also explains the sanctions likely to apply for misuse of AI including public admonishment, strike out and costs sanctions, referrals to regulators, contempt of court and, in the most egregious cases, referral to the police for criminal investigation. The judgment also provides a comprehensive index of cases from around the world where fake citations (or other misleading material) have been placed before the court. Written by Harriet Campbell, senior knowledge lawyer at Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—19 June 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the Online Procedure Rule Committee minutes of 12 May 2025 and the High Court decision in Phlo Technologies Ltd v Tallaght Financial Ltd (t/a Cubefunder) (injunctions); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an
What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal

If a beneficiary signs a deed of disclaimer of their share of an estate and the estate pays their legal fees, will that count as a PET against their estate?A disclaimer is the refusal of a gift prior to acceptance. The refusal of the gift must take place before the beneficiary accepts any benefit

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?

Can shares in a limited company that have not been paid-up at all be cancelled?A limited company having a share capital may not alter that share capital, except in the ways listed in section 617 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Shares in a company cannot simply be cancelled without following an