Court and the legal profession

This topic contains information that applies to the civil courts generally, such as links to court guides published by the individual courts and details of fees charged in the civil courts.

For detail of the structure and hierarchy of civil courts in England and Wales, see: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary—Structure of Courts and Tribunals System.

Online dispute resolution and the online court

Lord Justice Briggs, in his Final Report on the Civil Courts Structure Review, which was published on 27 July 2016, recommended the creation of an online court for the resolution of certain disputes. Since that report, there has been much discussion among the judiciary and elsewhere of the concept of online dispute resolution (ODR) and the need for digitisation of the dispute resolution process for civil proceedings in England and Wales.

HM Courts and Tribunals Service embarked on a significant reform programme for the justice system, which included the introduction of schemes to test online court environments.

The Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 also provided for Online Procedure Rules (OPR) to be made to govern practice and procedure of online civil proceedings,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Dispute Resolution News

Supreme Court delivers judgment on dishonest assistance liability in breach of fiduciary duties case (Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (in liquidation) and another)

The Supreme Court has allowed an appeal by a majority (Lord Burrows dissenting) affirming that a defendant is liable in dishonest assistance for assisting a fiduciary who has made unauthorised profits in breach of their fiduciary duties to dissipate those profits to the detriment of the company. James Pickering KC, barrister at Enterprise Chambers, Christopher Parker KC, barrister at Maitland Chambers, and Eleanor Temple KC, barrister at Kings Chambers, comment on the implications of the judgment.

Event to mark the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee and to launch the work of the Online Procedure Rule Committee

On 16 July 2025, the Master of the Rolls and Lord Justice Birss gave speeches at an event hosted by the Ministry of Justice and The Law Society. The event marked the 25th anniversary of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) and launched the public engagement work carried out by the Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC).

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—24 July 2025

This week’s edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes: analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2025, SI 2025/893 (in force on 12 September and 1 October 2025), the Supreme Court in Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (in liquidation) (dishonest assistance in fiduciary cases) and the Court of Appeal decision in Vesnin v Queeld Ventures Limited (meaning and effect of Tomlin orders); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

NHBC Buildmark Choice policies—cause of action accrues when the insured party ‘has to pay more’ to complete the building work as a result of contractor insolvency (NHBC v Peabody Trust)

Construction analysis: The Court of Appeal (CoA) confirmed that the cause of action under Option 1 of the National House Building Council (NHBC) Buildmark Choice policies does not accrue on contractor insolvency—the cause of action accrues when the insured party ‘has to pay more’ to complete the building work as a result of that insolvency. The moment in time at which the insured party should be considered to be in the position of ‘having to pay more’ has been left to be determined in future proceedings.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

News