General partnerships

This overview is a guide to the content within the General Partnerships subtopic, with links to the appropriate materials.

The Partnership Act 1890 (PA 1890) sets out the legal framework that applies to general partnerships.

A partnership under the PA 1890 is described as the relationship that subsists between persons (which includes individuals or corporate entities) carrying on a business (which includes every trade, occupation and profession) in common with a view of profit.

Nature of a general partnership and its legal framework

The PA 1890 does not provide a complete code of partnership law and expressly preserves the rules of equity and common law applicable to partnerships.

As a partnership is not a separate legal entity from its partners it cannot acquire rights, incur obligations or hold property in its own right. It is therefore important to distinguish between partnership property and property that personally belongs to an individual partner.

Each partner is an agent of the partnership and their other partners for the purposes of the partnership's business and can bind the partnership, and the other partners, by any action they take in the ordinary

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Corporate News

Corporate weekly highlights—12 December 2024

This week's edition of Corporate weekly highlights includes the High Court judgement in Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others, which clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles, the FCA’s 46th Quarterly Consultation, which proposes updates to the FCA Handbook to align it to the new edition of the UK Corporate Governance Code, and the Companies (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2024, which will reduce the reporting burden on companies. Also included is a recent case on constructive trusts in relation to the sale of shares, and an update on the CMA’s approval of the merger between Vodafone and Three.

Market Standards Trend Report—AGM season 2024

Corporate analysis: The latest Market Standards Trend Report reflects on the voting patterns displayed at the annual general meetings (AGMs) of FTSE 350 companies at the close of the 2024 AGM season. It also examines the issues for companies looking forward to the 2025 season and includes expert commentary by Will Chalk (Partner, Ashurt), Wilma Rix (Senior Associate, Linklaters) and Pete Fowler (Chief Operating Officer, Lumi Global).

FCA consults on Handbook updates to align with 2024 UK Corporate Governance Code

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has launched its 46th Quarterly Consultation, proposing regulatory changes across several sectors. A key proposal includes updating the FCA’s Handbook to align with the new edition of the UK Corporate Governance Code, published by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in January 2024 (the 2024 Code). This includes removing specific references to FRC guidance in the UK Listing Rules (UKLR) and Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR) sourcebooks, along with introducing transitional provisions for UKLR and DTR implementation. The FCA also proposes updating the Code's definition in the Handbook’s Glossary, as well as updating references to the Code’s guidance in the Systems and Controls sourcebook (SYSC), Code of Conduct sourcebook (COCON), Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons sourcebook (APER), and the Decision Procedure and Penalties manual (DEPP). The FCA considers the impact of these proposals to be minimal, and therefore, a detailed cost benefit analysis is not required. The consultation closes on 27 January 2025, with the FCA intending to implement these changes promptly after the consultation and Board approval, without a transition period, as companies subject to the Code are expected to be familiar with the updates.

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.