US law

This subtopic brings together materials on US law issues, grouped together according to subject matter.

US securities law issues in UK transactions

US securities law can impact on various capital markets transactions where there is a US element. See Practice Notes:

  1. Adding a US tranche to a public offer

  2. SAS 72 comfort letters in international securities offerings

  3. Regulation S—an introduction for non-US lawyers

  4. Marketing a initial public offer to QIBs in the United States of America—key considerations

Also, the following Practice Note considers factors and issues for overseas companies (including US issuers) looking to offer securities, including depositary receipts, in the UK: Overseas companies—options for a public offer of securities in the United Kingdom.

US IPOs and private offerings

For introductory guidance on the initial public offering (IPO) process in the United States, as well as guidance on private offerings, see the following Practice Notes (all of which are reproduced from Practical Guidance in the US:

  1. The US initial public offering process

  2. Managing the due diligence process for a US IPO

  3. Preparing

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Corporate News

High Court clarifies position of sole directors under Model Articles and the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and in-court appointment of administrators (Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd and others)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This High Court case (which addresses two important issues in UK company law and sanctions regulations) will be of interest to insolvency practitioners, corporate and restructuring lawyers, sanctions lawyers, and businesses and individuals which are affected by sanctions. Firstly, it clarifies the position of sole directors under the Model Articles for private limited companies. The court ruled that a sole director can validly pass board resolutions and bind the company, regardless of whether they have always been the sole director or were previously part of a multi-member board. This interpretation resolves conflicts between Article 7(2) and Article 11(2) of the Model Articles, with the court favouring Article 7(2)'s provisions. Secondly, the case examines the interaction between UK sanctions regulations and the in-court appointment of administrators. The court determined that making an administration application and order does not breach asset-freezing sanctions, even when the company is designated or controlled by a sanctioned person. While an Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) license is typically required for administrators to act, the court retains discretion to make immediate appointments in urgent situations. Written by Joshua Ray and Duncan Henderson, partners at CANDEY, which acted for the First and Second Applicants on this matter.

View Corporate by content type :

Popular documents