Incomplete offences

Incomplete offences

There may be circumstances where a defendant fails, for one reason or another, to commit a complete offence. For example:

•
they may be interrupted in the commission of an offence
•
their participation may amount to encouraging the commission of an offence by another, or
•
they may be party to an agreement with at least one other person to commit an offence

It is not necessary for a full offence to have been committed for a prosecution to take place in these circumstances as a defendant may be guilty of an offence on the basis of:

•
attempt
•
encouraging or assisting a crime, or
•
conspiracy

Incomplete offences always relate to a substantive offence and cannot be charged on their own. Therefore, an indictment must be drafted with reference to the complete offence, eg conspiracy to murder or attempted wounding. See Practice Note: The indictment.

Most incomplete offences should not be mixed together, eg it is not an offence to attempt to conspire.

Attempt

Most attempts will be governed by the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 (CAA 1981). A defendant

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Corporate Crime News

Compliance lessons from art dealers terror financing plea

Law360, London: The worlds of art and terrorism may seem very far removed from each other; the traditional images of each are dramatically different. However, the 9 May 2025 guilty plea and conviction in Westminster Magistrates' Court of Oghenochuko Ojiri, an art dealer also known for his role in the television programme Bargain Hunt, has brought the risks into sharp relief.

Joint prosecution for counterfeit cranberry sauce supply offences

West Yorkshire Trading Standards and Kirklees Council have jointly prosecuted Irfan Hanif Patel and Mohammed Patel for supplying counterfeit cranberry sauce. Irfan Patel, operating as a sole trader and Mohammed Patel, as director of Stock Up Direct Limited, have both pleaded guilty to offences under the Trade Marks Act 1994 and breaches of food hygiene regulations by trading without registering their food businesses. At Leeds Crown Court, Irfan Patel has been sentenced to a 12‐month community order including 120 hours of unpaid work and issued a confiscation order of £18,903, reflecting a declared benefit of £681,510.47 from criminal conduct. Mohammed Patel has been sentenced to a 12‐month community order with 100 hours of unpaid work and issued a confiscation order of £1,607, matching his declared benefit. The proceedings were conducted under the framework of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

From Russia with love? UK lawyers mull sanctions U-turn

Law360, London: Finance companies are enlisting white-collar lawyers to draw up plans for tapping back into Russia if the US breaks with its Western allies and eases sanctions, although experts warn that unpredictable political winds mean there are as many risks as opportunities.

OEP finds potential breaches of environmental law on wild bird protection by Defra and Natural England

The Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) has found potential breaches of environmental law by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Secretary of State and Natural England concerning the protection of wild birds. As a result, the OEP has issued information notices to both bodies, detailing its findings. They have until 5 August 2025 to respond, after which the OEP will review the responses before determining next steps. This follows an investigation launched by the OEP in March 2024. A parallel investigation is ongoing in Northern Ireland, with an information notice also issued to the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs.

View Corporate Crime by content type :

News