UK private competition actions

Companies or individuals who have suffered loss as a result of a breach (or alleged breach) of competition law may be able bring an action for damages in the UK against the party (or parties) that engaged in the anti-competitive behaviour.

Damages actions can either be 'stand-alone' (where there is no infringement decision by a competition authority) or 'follow-on' (relying on an infringement decision issued by a competition authority).

For detail on the UK damages regime, see UK damages actions.

In addition, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and sectoral regulators with concurrent competition powers can approve voluntary redress schemes, under which an undertaking that has breached competition law can voluntarily compensate any party that has suffered loss through the anti-competitive behaviour. Whilst the approval of a redress scheme does not of itself prevent a potential claimant from bringing a private action, the rules of a scheme can restrict potential claimants who accept redress under the scheme from bringing a damages claim with respect to that loss. See further, CMA behavioural investigation process — Redress schemes.

NOTE—for a summary of the impact of

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Competition News

Competition weekly highlights—26 February 2026

This week’s edition of Competition weekly highlights includes, from a UK perspective: (1) the CMA’s interim report in relation to its Getty Images/Shutterstock phase 2 investigation, (2) the government’s issuance of a pre-emptive action order following a PIIN in relation to DMGT/Telegraph Media Group, (3) the CMA’s response to DBT’s working paper on options for reform of non-compete clauses in employment contracts, (4) the EU/UK signing an agreement to co-operate closely on competition matters, (5) the Business Secretary announcing that Doug Gurr has been selected as preferred candidate to remain as Chair of the CMA, (6) the CAT’s judgment on a strike-out application and expert evidence in relation to a collective damages action brought by Ad Tech against Google, and (7) a CAT ruling refusing permission to appeal in a claim alleging competition law breaches by Faculty of Advocates Services. This week’s highlights also includes, from an EU perspective: (1) publication by the Commission of a summary of consultation responses on the ongoing review of the FSR, (2) publication by the Commission of consultation responses received to the review of Regulation 1/2003, (3) the Commission launching a consultation on the draft new State aid General Block Exemption Regulation, (4) publication of the European Parliament’s resolution on the Commission’s 2024 Competition Policy report, and (5) the General Court’s judgment dismissing an action challenging the Commission’s refusal of access to DMA designation documents.

View Competition by content type :

Popular documents