Multi-jurisdictional mergers - local guides

When a business is acquired, when firms merge, or when a joint venture is established, it is necessary to consider whether the transaction will be subject to merger control rules in any country in which a party to the transaction is active.

There are merger control regimes in over 150 jurisdictions throughout the world, the vast majority of which require mandatory notifications to be filed if the specified thresholds are met. Penalties can be, and are, imposed on companies that fail to notify transactions and deals can be suspended until regulators have cleared them.

In many of those jurisdictions, a transaction cannot be completed until the relevant authority has issued a clearance decision. This requires advisors to factor in time delay where merger notifications are required and the impact that uncertainty may have on the deal.

If the transaction does fall within merger control rules, a notification to the relevant competition authorities may be required. This may be necessary even if there are no obvious

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Competition News

Competition weekly highlights—11 December 2025

This week's edition of Competition weekly highlights includes, from a UK perspective: (1) the CMA's decision that Vandemoortele/Délifrance merger meets the test for reference to phase 2, (2) the CMA's decision to launch a strategic review of legacy merger remedies, (3) a Court of Appeal's judgment upholding the dismissal of LetterOne's compensation claim following a NSI Act 2021 divestment order, (4) a High Court judgment dismissing Brazilian orange growers' cartel damages claims as time-barred under Brazilian law, and (5) publication by the CMA Microeconomics Unit of a report on technology, productivity and competition. This week's highlights also include, from an EU perspective: (1) a General Court judgment reducing Intel's ‘naked restrictions’ fine but rejecting annulment, (2) a General Court judgment dismissing an action against the Commission's rejection of a complaint in the Fire Protection Bogies case, (3) the Commission's decision to launch an investigation into Meta's restrictions on AI providers' access to WhatsApp, (4) the Commission's decision to launch an investigation into Google's use of publisher and YouTube content for AI training, (5) the Commission's decision to unconditionally clear Mars/Kellanova after phase II, (6) the Commission's decision to refer TIL/Hutchison Ports/TERCAT to phase II, (7) Meta's commitment to give EU users choice on personalised ads under DMA, and (8) a General Court judgment dismissing an action against the Commission's decision to approve restructuring aid of €2.55bn granted to Portugal to TAP.

View Competition by content type :

Popular documents