Supply chain trading risks

Different types of trading risks can occur within a supply chain which may lead to increased costs and reduced profitability. The increasingly global nature of manufacturing supply chains makes managing risk more difficult and the consequences of supply chain failures more significant.

Trading risks may be specific to a trading partner (whether customer or supplier), for example financial difficulties, such as cash flow or debt problems, or IT and data security breaches.

Other risks may stem from external factors, such as uncertain geopolitical and financial landscapes across various jurisdictions which disrupt harmonious conditions between markets. Thus, supply chain risks that nearly every business must now routinely consider extend beyond natural disasters, pandemics, and market downturns, and include unpredictable consumption patterns, labour unavailability, product scarcity, global logistics issues, and the rise of geopolitical tensions.

Furthermore, in certain industries and sectors, businesses are being forced to implement increased scrutiny and monitoring of their supply chains through regulatory and other compliance and certification requirements.

As no two supply chains are the same, businesses need to identify the risks to their own supply chain and reduce their exposure to that

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Commercial News

ASA rulings—18 February 2026

Three complaints were received by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) about paid-for in-app ads displayed on the Vinted app, relating to depictions of domestic violence and sexual assault, and sexually explicit content. The ASA upheld the complaints, highlighting its continued focus on in-app advertising, particularly ads served within third-party platforms such as Vinted, and reinforcing its expectation that marketers ensure content is socially responsible and appropriate for a broad audience.

OPSS updates guidance on business notifications of unsafe and non-compliant products

The Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) has updated its guidance on how businesses should notify authorities about unsafe or non-compliant products. The guidance outlines the obligations for businesses supplying consumer and non-consumer products on the UK market to notify relevant authorities where products pose a risk to consumer health and safety or do not comply with the relevant legislation.

Court of Appeal clarifies approach to conflicting dispute resolution clauses (Tyson v GIC Re, India)

Commercial analysis: The Court of Appeal has clarified the interpretation of conflicting dispute resolution clauses. Where inconsistent provisions (for example, conflicting arbitration and jurisdiction clauses) are contained within the same document, the document must be read as a whole, with effect given to all clauses if possible. However, this principle has limited application where the conflicting clauses are in different documents and governed by a hierarchy provision or 'confusion clause'. In that instance, (as in this case), where the clauses are inconsistent the hierarchy clause will apply. This significant judgment highlights the value of a clearly drafted express hierarchy provision in cases of conflict. Written by Harriet Campbell, senior knowledge lawyer at Penningtons Manches Cooper.

Commission opens DSA formal proceedings against Shein

The European Commission has opened formal proceedings against Shein under the EU Digital Services Act (DSA) for alleged violations relating to addictive design, lack of transparency of recommender systems, and the sale of illegal products including child sexual abuse material. The investigation will examine Shein's systems to limit illegal product sales in the European Union, risks linked to addictive service design including consumer rewards for engagement, and transparency of recommender systems used to propose content and products to users. Coimisiún na Meán, Ireland's Digital Services Coordinator, will be associated with the investigation as Shein's national coordinator in its EU country of establishment. The proceedings follow preliminary analyses of risk assessment reports and responses to three formal information requests sent between June 2024 and November 2025. The Commission will gather additional evidence through information requests, monitoring actions and interviews, and is empowered to take enforcement steps including interim measures or adoption of a non-compliance decision, or to accept commitments from Shein to remedy the matters under investigation.