Construction arbitration

This subtopic forms part of the Arbitration module. An equivalent subtopic can be found in the Construction module: Arbitration for construction lawyers—overview.

An introduction to arbitration for construction lawyers

What is arbitration and how does it differ from other dispute resolution procedures? This Practice Note looks at the general principles behind the arbitration process, including those set out in the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) and compares it to litigation and adjudication. It also considers the use of arbitration for disputes in the construction industry. For further information, see Practice Note: An introduction to arbitration for construction lawyers.

The pros and cons of arbitration in construction disputes

This Practice Note considers the advantages and disadvantages of selecting arbitration as an alternative means of dispute resolution

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Arbitration News

Arbitration weekly highlights—20 November 2025

This week's edition of Arbitration weekly highlights includes coverage of arbitration-related decisions from England and Wales, Singapore, the UAE, EU, and Uganda, and updates from the SCC, HKIAC, KCAB and the Baku Arbitration Centre (BAC). All this, and more, in our weekly highlights.

Singapore—set side-breach of natural justice; remission of awards (PVN v PM)

Arbitration analysis: In Vietnam Oil and Gas Group (PVN) v Joint Stock Company (Power Machines-ZTL, LMZ, Electrosila Energomachexport) [2025] SGCA 50, the Singapore Court of Appeal set aside an arbitral award for breach of the fair hearing rule, after a tribunal introduced a reasoning (that a second termination notice replaced an earlier one) not raised by either party, leading to a US$307m award. The court held that this unforeseeable reasoning violated natural justice, as PVN had no chance to address it and could have presented further expert evidence. While confirming the issue fell within the tribunal’s jurisdiction, the court refused remission, finding that fairness concerns and prejudgment risks outweighed procedural correction. The decision underscores Singapore’s strict adherence to natural justice and clarifies that remission is inappropriate where a tribunal’s reasoning departs materially from the parties’ cases. Written by Elodie Dulac, partner of King & Spalding (Singapore) LLP.

KCAB International announces the official release of the 2026 KCAB International Arbitration Rules

The Korean Commercial Arbitration Board’s international division (KCAB International) has announced the release of the 2026 KCAB International Arbitration Rules, marking a milestone in institutional reform and innovation. The new Rules, which come into force on 1 January 2026, represent the first comprehensive revision since 2016 and set a new global benchmark for transparency, efficiency, and technological advancement in international arbitration.

Baku Arbitration Centre inaugurated as first arbitral institution in Azerbaijan

The Baku Arbitration Centre (BAC) was officially inaugurated in Baku on 24–25 October 2025 during the Azerbaijan Arbitration Days conference, marking the establishment of first arbitral institution based in Azerbaijan. The two-day event, held under the theme ‘Driving the Transformation’, underscored the country’s growing role as a regional hub for international dispute resolution.