Construction arbitration

This subtopic forms part of the Arbitration module. An equivalent subtopic can be found in the Construction module: Arbitration for construction lawyers—overview.

An introduction to arbitration for construction lawyers

What is arbitration and how does it differ from other dispute resolution procedures? This Practice Note looks at the general principles behind the arbitration process, including those set out in the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) and compares it to litigation and adjudication. It also considers the use of arbitration for disputes in the construction industry. For further information, see Practice Note: An introduction to arbitration for construction lawyers.

The pros and cons of arbitration in construction disputes

This Practice Note considers the advantages and disadvantages of selecting arbitration as an alternative means of dispute resolution

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Arbitration News

SIAC appoints Samuel Leong as new Deputy Registrar

The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) has appointed Samuel Leong as Deputy Registrar. Leong, who rejoined SIAC as Supervising Counsel in March 2023, brings experience from both institutional and private practice, having previously served at SIAC from 2012-2014. A Lexology Index Global Elite Thought Leader and Legal 500 Powerlist member, Leong joins a secretariat of 17 lawyers qualified across 13 jurisdictions. Leong holds degrees from the University of Malaya and Columbia University.

EAIAC publishes 2025 conference programme focusing on sanctions and resource disputes

The East Africa International Arbitration Conference (EAIAC) has published its programme for its 2025 conference, scheduled for 25-26 September 2025. The two-day event will address emerging challenges in international arbitration, with dedicated sessions on sanctions-related disputes, arbitrating during conflicts, and natural resource disputes under the AfCFTA Investment Protocol. Key topics include procedures for sanctions-related arbitrations, risk management in conflict zones, and regulatory framework changes affecting natural resource investments. The conference will also examine developments in Pan-African arbitration and include the 6th Africa Arbitration Awards. Sessions will cover practical aspects such as addressing risk conflicts in contracts, arbitrating commercial and investment disputes arising from conflicts, and valuation challenges in natural resources cases.

Arbitrator’s non-Disclosure and interim relief in foreign-seated arbitration (Engineering Projects (India) Ltd V MSA Global LLC (Oman))

Arbitration analysis: The Delhi High Court has recently granted an anti-arbitration injunction in Engineering Projects (India) Ltd v MSA Global LLC (Oman), staying the ongoing ICC proceedings seated in Singapore on account of the arbitrator’s non-disclosure of a prior appointment by the opposing party’s chairman. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, a learned Single Judge of the Court, held that such non-disclosure, struck at the root of party consent and procedural fairness. The learned Single Judge held the arbitral proceedings as being prima facie vexatious and oppressive, and thus injuncted the said proceedings. This landmark decision takes a divergent view from previous decisions of the court, which traditionally followed a ‘hands off’ approach particularly in foreign seated arbitrations. It sets a potentially dangerous precedent where an Indian Court may interfere in the arbitral process notwithstanding the fact that the parties have chosen a seat outside India, particularly in cases where procedural fairness is involved. Written by Saurabh Seth, founder at Chambers of Saurabh Seth.

USA—New York judge orders Temu users to arbitrate data claims

Law360, London: A New York federal judge ordered a group of plaintiffs accusing online bargain app Temu of privacy violations to arbitrate their claims, saying an arbitration agreement in the company's terms is not unconscionable and that an arbitrator must determine the pact's scope.