With reform of retained EU law high on the agenda, post-Brexit legal changes remains a key issue. Get key information and updates for all practitioners, with practice area specific Brexit content across the modules.
We outline the key principles and procedural requirements with a clear focus on the public sector perspective. The content focusses primarily on judicial review in the Administrative Court in England and Wales.
Failure to stick to procedures can have significant legal, financial and practical consequences for a contracting authority. We guide you through various processes, focussing on the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.
An essential resource providing guidance & materials on core legal subjects relevant to lawyers in all areas of legal practice, as well as specialist content designed to assist government lawyers in a range of key areas
Life Sciences analysis: The request for a preliminary ruling that gave rise to Case C-371/26 was made in the context of proceedings before the Danish...
The government is to revise the Attorney General’s legal risk guidance to make clear that ministers may properly proceed with a policy carrying a high...
The House of Commons Culture Media and Sport Committee has published the government’s response to its report on cultural touring in the EU. The...
The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) has reported 3 statutory instruments (SIs) in its 9th report of session 2026–27....
This week’s edition of Public Law weekly highlights includes a hand-picked summary of news analysis, legal updates and case law from the world of...
The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL(RR)A 2023) was granted Royal Assent on 29 June 2023. Although pared back in ambition from...
Statutory frameworkThe Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is an independent non-departmental public body established under the Equality Act...
With the government's continued focus on enhancing the UK's position as an independent trading nation, we have published a range of analysis...
IntroductionOn 27 February 2023 UK Prime Minster Rishi Sunak and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a deal on the post-Brexit rules...
Below tracks recent European Commission ongoing in-depth investigations and ongoing State aid sector inquiries. Closed investigations are moved to EU...
This Agreement is made on [date]Parties1[insert name of party] [of OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered...
1. Name of applicant[insert details]2. If the applicant is requesting info on behalf of a third party, third party’s name[insert details]3. Address...
This Agreement is made on [date]Parties1[insert name of party] [of OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered...
[On headed notepaper of the assignor]To: [Insert name and address of Assignee][Insert date]Dear [insert name of Assignee]Assignment of contractWe...
This DEED is made on [date]Parties1[insert name of Assignor] [of OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number [insert registered...
Sources of constitutional lawIn briefThe British constitution is unwritten in the sense that it does not derive from a single constitutional text. It...
Methods of statutory interpretation used to resolve disputes about the meaning of legislationIntroduction to statutory interpretationThe aim of...
Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human...
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to...
Grounds of judicial review—unreasonablenessThis Practice Note outlines the ground of judicial review usually known as unreasonableness or...
Separation of powers—legislative, executive and judiciarySource of the doctrine of the separation of powersThe origins of the doctrine of the...
Grounds of judicial review—illegalityOverview of the illegality groundIllegality is the first of the grounds on judicial review set out by Lord...
What is a public authority?There is no single, universal answer to the question whether a particular organisation is treated, in law, as a public...
Grounds of judicial review—procedural improprietyProcedural impropriety as a ground of judicial review‘Procedural impropriety’ is the last of the...
Judicial review—interested parties and intervenersInterested partiesIn the context of judicial review, an interested party is 'any person (other than...
Parliamentary supremacy—implied repealEssential to Parliament’s legislative supremacy is the principle that Parliament is not bound by its...
Grounds of judicial review—breach of legitimate expectationThe ground of challenge based on legitimate expectations is designed to hold a public...
Royal ChartersWhat is a Royal Charter?The term 'Royal Charter' has transformed over time. Originally, a Royal Charter was a procedure by which the...
Costs for judicial review—general principlesGeneral rule on costs in judicial reviewThe general rule in relation to costs in judicial review, as in...
Judicial review—what it is and when it can be usedWhat is judicial review?Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory...
Judicial deference and the margin of appreciationJudicial deference is also known as the principle that 'respect is a central concept in judicial...
Breach of the peace describes actual or threatened violence, or a disturbance causing fear of such harm, and the preventive powers used to stop it.
In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, it is a common law concept, not a criminal offence. Case law (R v Howell [1982] QB 416) holds that it occurs where harm is done or likely to be done to a person or, in their presence, property, or a person fears such harm from an imminent disturbance. Police and citizens may arrest without warrant to prevent a breach that is occurring, imminent or likely to be renewed; magistrates may bind over to keep the peace or be of good behaviour.
In Scotland, breach of the peace is a common law offence. The test (Smith v Donnelly 2002 JC 65) requires conduct severe enough to cause alarm to ordinary people and threaten serious disturbance. Cases proceed under section 38 Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 (threatening or abusive behaviour).
In Ireland, the term is descriptive alongside statutory public order offences (Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994) and peace‑bond orders; Gardaí may intervene to prevent imminent violence.
Practically, it underpins protest policing and unlawful arrest claims.
A public corporation generally refers, in UK and Irish legal practice, to a body established by statute to carry on commercial or service activities on behalf of the state, with a distinct legal personality and a degree of operational independence from ministers. It is commonly used to describe nationalised industries or state-sponsored bodies that trade, hold assets and incur liabilities in their own name.
In the UK, “public corporation” is primarily a descriptive term used in public law, administrative law and public finance, and appears in legislation such as the Office for National Statistics classifications and sectoral statutes creating specific corporations. Public corporations typically have a statutory constitution, a board appointed (wholly or mainly) by government, borrowing or funding powers, and are subject to public law duties, audit and accountability frameworks.
In Ireland, the concept is broadly similar, though entities are more often referred to as “state bodies”, “semi-state bodies” or “commercial state-sponsored bodies”, with the precise legal form determined by their establishing Act.
Across all jurisdictions, understanding whether a body is a public corporation is important for issues such as judicial review, state aid, public procurement, FOI, liability, and classification for public sector finance and insolvency purposes.
Uti possidetis juris is a principle of public international law that preserves existing administrative or colonial boundaries as the legal frontiers of newly independent states at the moment of independence. In practice, it is used to determine state borders and avoid territorial disputes when empires or federations break up.
The doctrine is not set out in a single statute, but has been developed through international case law, including decisions of the International Court of Justice. It is commonly applied in decolonisation and state succession contexts, for example in Africa, Latin America and the former Yugoslavia.
For UK and Irish legal practitioners, uti possidetis juris is relevant when advising on state recognition, territorial sovereignty, boundary disputes, treaty interpretation, and public international law litigation or arbitration. It distinguishes between merely factual possession (uti possidetis de facto) and possession backed by prior legal title.
Usage and meaning are consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, as all rely on general public international law. The term is rarely used in domestic constitutional or property law, where different doctrines govern possession and title.