With reform of retained EU law high on the agenda, post-Brexit legal changes remains a key issue. Get key information and updates for all practitioners, with practice area specific Brexit content across the modules.
We outline the key principles and procedural requirements with a clear focus on the public sector perspective. The content focusses primarily on judicial review in the Administrative Court in England and Wales.
Failure to stick to procedures can have significant legal, financial and practical consequences for a contracting authority. We guide you through various processes, focussing on the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.
An essential resource providing guidance & materials on core legal subjects relevant to lawyers in all areas of legal practice, as well as specialist content designed to assist government lawyers in a range of key areas
Public Law analysis: Involve confirms that contracting authorities may re-moderate tender scores without expressly reserving that power in the...
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) has published its 12th report of session 2026–27. At its meeting on 15 September...
The Cabinet Office has updated the Sourcing Playbook to incorporate a replacement financial viability risk assessment tool, used by contracting...
The Cabinet Office has published a joint statement following a meeting of the UK-EU Specialised Committee on the Implementation of the Windsor...
Law360, London: Human resources software company, MHR International UK Ltd, has brought proceedings against the government-funded National Heritage...
This Practice Note sets out the protection available for trade secrets and confidential information in a commercial context, in particular in cases...
Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or...
On 17 August 2026, a revised version of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published which made significant amendments to the...
Assimilated law and retained EU law are concepts introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A 2018), as amended, in connection with...
The below tracks live General Court appeal cases involving State aid (Articles 107 to 109 TFEU). For completed cases, see General Court State aid...
This Precedent is drafted in contemplation of arrangements where the parties wish to insert data processing provisions within a Schedule rather than...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE[[INSERT DIVISION]][[INSERT LOCATION] DISTRICT REGISTRY]Parties[Insert the Claimant’s name]by [his OR her] litigation...
This Agreement is made on [date]Parties1[Insert name of party][ of [insert details] OR a company incorporated in [England and Wales] under number...
1Interest on late paymentIf either party fails to make payment in accordance with this Agreement the other party shall be entitled, in addition to any...
ARCHIVED: This Precedent has been archived and is not maintained.DefinitionsPartner(s)•meansEITHER:[the following: [insert names of partners]ORthose...
Sources of constitutional lawIn briefThe British constitution is unwritten in the sense that it does not derive from a single constitutional text. It...
Methods of statutory interpretation used to resolve disputes about the meaning of legislationIntroduction to statutory interpretationThe aim of...
Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human...
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to...
Grounds of judicial review—unreasonablenessThis Practice Note outlines the ground of judicial review usually known as unreasonableness or...
Separation of powers—legislative, executive and judiciarySource of the doctrine of the separation of powersThe origins of the doctrine of the...
Grounds of judicial review—illegalityOverview of the illegality groundIllegality is the first of the grounds on judicial review set out by Lord...
What is a public authority?There is no single, universal answer to the question whether a particular organisation is treated, in law, as a public...
Grounds of judicial review—procedural improprietyProcedural impropriety as a ground of judicial review‘Procedural impropriety’ is the last of the...
Judicial review—interested parties and intervenersInterested partiesIn the context of judicial review, an interested party is 'any person (other than...
Parliamentary supremacy—implied repealEssential to Parliament’s legislative supremacy is the principle that Parliament is not bound by its...
Grounds of judicial review—breach of legitimate expectationThe ground of challenge based on legitimate expectations is designed to hold a public...
Royal ChartersWhat is a Royal Charter?The term 'Royal Charter' has transformed over time. Originally, a Royal Charter was a procedure by which the...
Costs for judicial review—general principlesGeneral rule on costs in judicial reviewThe general rule in relation to costs in judicial review, as in...
Judicial review—what it is and when it can be usedWhat is judicial review?Judicial review is a process by which the courts exercise a supervisory...
Judicial deference and the margin of appreciationJudicial deference is also known as the principle that 'respect is a central concept in judicial...
Genocide refers in legal practice to certain extreme acts of mass violence committed with the intention of destroying a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part. It is most often encountered in the context of international criminal law, asylum and immigration claims, universal jurisdiction, extradition, and human rights litigation.
In the UK and Ireland, “genocide” is not a general common law term but a legally defined international crime. Its core elements derive from the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, implemented in the UK by the Genocide Act 1969 (now largely superseded) and subsequent legislation, and in Ireland by the Genocide Act 1973 and later statutes. Domestic courts interpret the term consistently with international jurisprudence, including decisions of international criminal tribunals.
Key features include: (1) specified underlying acts, such as killing or causing serious bodily or mental harm; (2) the targeting of a protected group; and (3) the specific intent (dolus specialis) to destroy that group as such. Usage and legal meaning are broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland.
Indecent exposure describes deliberately revealing one’s genitals so that another person will see them and be alarmed or distressed. In England and Wales it is commonly prosecuted as the statutory offence of “exposure” under the Sexual Offences Act 2003; the conduct need not be in a public place, and key elements are intentional exposure of the genitals and an intention that someone will see and be caused alarm or distress. Recklessness or accidental exposure is insufficient. Related charges may include outraging public decency or public order offences.
In Scotland, comparable conduct is criminalised under the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 (often termed “sexual exposure”), replacing older common law labels such as shameless or public indecency. Northern Ireland mirrors the England and Wales approach in the Sexual Offences (Northern Ireland) Order 2008.
In Ireland, the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017 creates offences covering exposure and offensive conduct of a sexual nature, typically requiring that it occurs in or near a public place and targets causing fear, distress or alarm.
Conviction is a sexual offence and, depending on sentence and jurisdiction, may trigger sex offender notification requirements and ancillary orders. Practically, intent, context (public/private visibility), and impact on observers are central to charging and defence.
Investigatory power refers to the legal authority of a public body or office‑holder to obtain information, compel cooperation or otherwise investigate suspected wrongdoing, regulatory breaches or threats to the public interest. In UK and Irish practice, the term is descriptive rather than a single defined concept, and covers a wide range of statutory and common law powers.
Examples include police powers to search, seize and interview; regulators’ powers to require documents and information; and surveillance, interception and data‑acquisition powers exercised by intelligence agencies and law enforcement. In the UK these are principally derived from specific legislation such as the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, together with sector‑specific statutes. In Ireland, key sources include the Garda Síochána (Powers) Acts and regulatory enforcement legislation.
Across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, investigatory powers are constrained by constitutional and human rights standards (including Article 8 ECHR / privacy rights), requirements of necessity and proportionality, and procedural safeguards such as warrants, independent authorisation, and judicial and parliamentary oversight.