Public sector contract disputes

This subtopic is aimed at public sector lawyers dealing with contract matters and considers some of the key issues that parties may encounter in relation to contract interpretation and disputes, including:

•
contract interpretation
•
representations and misrepresentation
•
remedies for breach
•
damages in tort
•
limitation of liability
•
dispute resolution clauses

The guidance in this subtopic is intended to provide an overview of the main commercial issues relevant to contractual disputes, remedies and liability. Further detailed guidance on breach of contract and dispute resolution methods is available from Lexis+® UK Commercial and Dispute Resolution.

Contract interpretation

Disputes about contracts are inevitable. No matter the care and effort made in drafting a contract, the imperfect and imprecise nature of language means there will always be room for differences of opinion on interpretation. Also, despite the position of the parties at the start of any relationship, there may be a change in their views over time, therefore the parties must consider the extent to which they will address the real possibility of disputes arising out of or in connection with their contracts.

Many contractual disputes

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

Master of the Rolls speech addresses AI adoption in legal profession and digital assets jurisdiction alignment

In his speech at the Legal Geek Conference, Master of the Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos highlighted the rapid shift in attitudes towards AI within the legal profession. Sir Geoffrey Vos emphasised that AI is a powerful tool, capable of streamlining tasks such as summarising documents and conducting legal research, but cautioned that its use must be grounded in understanding, privacy protection and careful verification. He asserted that AI can assist in drafting contracts and even generating legal advice or judgments, but stressed that its role should be carefully considered, particularly in judicial decision-making, where ethical and societal implications are profound.

Public Law weekly highlights—16 October 2025

This week’s edition of Public Law weekly highlights includes a hand-picked summary of news analysis, legal updates and case law from the world of Public Law. These highlights include the latest updates on Brexit, judicial review, constitutional and administrative law, equality and human rights, public procurement, state aid and subsidy control, state accountability and liability, information law, management and strategic planning and other Public Law news.

Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights raises concerns on UK legal framework for trans people

The Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights, Michael O’Flaherty, has written to Chairs of the Joint Committee on Human Rights and of the Women and Equalities Committee outlining concerns about the current climate for trans people in the UK. O’Flaherty referenced European Court of Human Rights case law affirming that gender identity falls under the scope of private life protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He noted that legal gender recognition should be meaningful and coherent across domestic legal frameworks, including the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA 2004).

UKCMG publishes eighth report reviewing the UK constitution

The UK Constitution Monitoring Group (UKCMG) has published its eighth biannual report covering January-June 2025, highlighting persistent concerns about constitutional standards under the Labour government. Key developments include Tulip Siddiq's resignation as Treasury minister following an investigation, postponement of local elections in multiple English counties until 2026 and continued use of fast-track legislation procedures. The report criticises the government's failure to update the outdated 2011 Cabinet Manual and raises concerns about increasing court backlogs, with Crown Court cases rising 11% to 76,957.