Public sector contract disputes

This subtopic is aimed at public sector lawyers dealing with contract matters and considers some of the key issues that parties may encounter in relation to contract interpretation and disputes, including:

•
contract interpretation
•
representations and misrepresentation
•
remedies for breach
•
damages in tort
•
limitation of liability
•
dispute resolution clauses

The guidance in this subtopic is intended to provide an overview of the main commercial issues relevant to contractual disputes, remedies and liability. Further detailed guidance on breach of contract and dispute resolution methods is available from Lexis+® UK Commercial and Dispute Resolution.

Contract interpretation

Disputes about contracts are inevitable. No matter the care and effort made in drafting a contract, the imperfect and imprecise nature of language means there will always be room for differences of opinion on interpretation. Also, despite the position of the parties at the start of any relationship, there may be a change in their views over time, therefore the parties must consider the extent to which they will address the real possibility of disputes arising out of or in connection with their contracts.

Many contractual disputes

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

IfG publishes commentary on Leveson review of criminal courts

The Institute for Government (IfG) has published a commentary on Sir Brian Leveson’s review of the criminal courts, which sets out proposals to address the backlog in the Crown Court system in England and Wales. The review recommends reducing the use of jury trials by retaining more cases in magistrates’ courts, establishing a new Crown Court Bench Division composed of a judge and two magistrates, and allowing judge-only trials in certain serious and complex cases, particularly complex fraud. These measures are presented as pragmatic responses to increasing case complexity and the volume of digital evidence, with an estimated saving of up to 9,000 sitting days annually. While the IfG acknowledges the urgency of reform, it questions whether restricting jury trials is necessary. It notes that overall demand on the courts remains below early 2010s levels and that the total time spent on jury trials has declined by nearly 25% since 2016. The commentary attributes the backlog primarily to a decline in court productivity, citing staffing shortages, infrastructure limitations and operational inefficiencies. It concludes that targeted investment and operational reform could reduce delays without significantly altering the role of jury trials in the justice system.

Sir Geoffrey Vos gives evidence to Lords Constitution Committee on rule of law

The Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice, Sir Geoffrey Vos, appeared before the House of Lords Constitution Committee to provide evidence for their rule of law inquiry. Sir Geoffrey Vos detailed plans to modernise civil justice in England and Wales. He outlined three key priorities: expanding digital platforms in County Court, replacing the CE-File system with AI-enabled case management and developing a pre-court digital justice system. Currently only 11% of County Court cases use digital systems. Sir Geoffrey Vos reported that Civil Automatic Referral to Mediation (CARM) has been implemented for claims under £10,000, with a 37-38% success rate since becoming mandatory.

SLSC publishes 32nd report of session 2024–25

The Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) has published its 32nd Report of 2024–25, drawing special attention to the Welfare of Animals (Transport) (Amendment) Regulations 2025. The regulations amend EU law to permit lifting chickens and small turkeys by their legs during transport—a practice currently prohibited but widely used. The SLSC highlights concerns about reduced welfare standards and inadequate enforcement, noting no prosecutions despite widespread non-compliance. The changes create a regulatory divergence between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, though the EU is expected to implement similar changes.

Cabinet Office confirms £100m innovation squads for ten local areas

Cabinet Office has announced that ten communities across England will receive ‘innovation squads’ as part of a £100m ‘Test, Learn and Grow’ reform programme to deliver the Plan for Change. The squads—made up of policy officials, tech specialists and other experts—will work with local government and service users to test new ways of addressing local challenges. These include increasing uptake of Best Start Family Hubs, establishing neighbourhood health services, supporting children with special needs, improving employment access, expanding breakfast clubs and tackling violence against women and girls. The programme aims to move away from a ‘Whitehall knows best’ approach by trialling solutions directly in communities. Previous pilots in Sheffield and Liverpool led to increased family hub use and the development of a data-led platform for managing temporary accommodation. The next phase is set to involve Barnsley, Wakefield, Manchester, Liverpool, Sandwell, Northumberland, Essex, Plymouth and Nottingham, with London boroughs to be confirmed.