Residential tenancies

Residential tenancies—letting arrangements

The main types of residential tenancy in England are:

•
regulated tenancies governed by the Rent Act 1977 (RA 1977)
•
assured tenancies governed by the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988)
•
assured shorthold tenancies governed by HA 1988
•
public sector tenancies governed by the Housing Act 1985, and
•
common law tenancies

See Practice Notes: A summary of types of private residential tenancies and Secure tenancies.

Most licences and tenancies of dwellings in Wales are occupation contracts which are governed by the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 (RH(W)A 2016).

See Property considerations in Wales—overview for further information.

Regulated tenancies under the Rent Act 1977

RA 1977 introduced the 'protected tenancy' under which the tenant had the right to a fair rent and security of tenure. Protected tenancies have been replaced by assured tenancies under HA 1988 and consequently RA 1977 will generally only apply to tenancies created before 15 January 1989.

Existing protected tenancies continue to have protection and may be fixed term or periodic. When a protected tenancy comes

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property News

Welsh Government announces £24m loan scheme for housing land development

The Welsh Government has allocated £24m in loan funding through its Land for Housing scheme to enable the development of more than 600 new homes across Wales. The funding supports land acquisition for both social and market housing developments, with loans being repaid and reinvested when construction funding is secured. The announcement highlights a previous £3m loan to Wales & West Housing for land in Grangetown, Cardiff, which led to the development of 100 affordable social rent homes. The scheme aims to contribute to the Welsh Government's target of delivering 20,000 new low carbon social homes during the current Senedd term.

Failure to publish section 106 agreement could put planning permission at risk (Greenfields (IOW) Ltd v Isle of Wight Council)

Planning analysis: In Greenfields, the Court of Appeal quashed a grant of planning permission on the ground that the authority failed to publish the section 106 planning obligation prior to granting planning permissionr). Publication of the heads of terms in the planning officer’s report did not constitute substantial compliance, as the heads of terms were not sufficiently detailed to allow the public to know the terms of the planning obligation and to comment on it if they chose to do so. Local planning authorities must publish a proposed or agreed planning obligation before granting planning permission, otherwise, the planning permission is liable to be quashed by the courts. However, it may be possible to avoid quashing if the authority can show that there was substantial compliance with the requirement, and no prejudice was caused. Written by Victoria Searle, principal associate at Browne Jacobson.

The interpretation of the sequential test in retail planning (Tesco v SMBC)

Planning analysis: The primary issue considered by the Court of Appeal in this judgment was whether a local planning authority misunderstood and misapplied the ‘sequential test’ in national and development plan policy for retail development when determining an application for planning permission for a new food store on a site neither in nor on the edge of a town centre. Paragraph 87 of the 2021 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (now para 91 of the updated 2024 version) requires local planning authorities to apply a sequential test with main town centre uses being located in town centres, then edge of centre locations, with out of centre sites being considered if suitable sites are not available. The Court of Appeal decision serves as an important reminder of the difference between policy application which is for the decision maker and policy interpretation which is for the courts. The court sets out its detailed interpretation of para 87 which will be of interest to those involved in retail planning. Written by Sarah Sutherland, practice development lawyer at Burges Salmon LLP.

Property weekly highlights—15 May 2025

This week's edition of Property weekly highlights includes: a new Law Society practice note on climate risk and property transactions, an update from the Law Society on the Committee Stage of the Renters’ Rights Bill and on form TA6 following NTSELAT’s withdrawal of its material information guidance, a consultation on draft regulations to alter valuation framework for telecoms leases, a change to permitted development rights that support the installation and operation of off-street electric vehicle charging points and cases on boundary determination, rescission of a declaration of trust, interpretation of the sequential test in national and development plan policy for retail development and the setting aside of a possession order in favour of administrators where the property was subject to a mortgage with receivers already appointed.