Service charge and outgoings

Both residential and commercial landlords aim for a 'clear lease': where the costs of repair, maintenance and provision of services are met by the tenants rather than being deducted from the rent received.

Where a building is in multi-occupation it is sensible for repair, maintenance and services to be controlled by the landlord, with the costs being recovered from tenants through the service charge.

In commercial leases the tenant's obligation to pay service charge, and the landlord's ability to recover costs, are entirely contractual and are not subject to statutory control. In residential leases the tenant's obligation to pay depends on there being a contractual service charge clause, but the landlord's ability to appoint managing agents, carry out works and to recover costs is heavily regulated by statute.

Service charges in commercial property—RICS professional statement

Commercial service charges are not (yet at least) subject to statutory control. However, the first edition of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) professional statement, ‘Service charges in commercial property’ (the Service Charge Statement), is effective for all service charge periods commencing on and from 1 April 2019. It supersedes the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property News

EA and Defra publish FloodReady review and action plan on property flood resilience

The Environment Agency (EA) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) have published the FloodReady review, setting out Professor Peter Bonfield’s independent review of property flood resilience (PFR) across England. The review, commissioned in January 2025, makes 22 recommendations across six strategic themes, including regulatory and legislative frameworks, trusted and accessible products and services and reducing water runoff at property level. These recommendations are supported by an action plan designed to accelerate the uptake of PFR measures for homes and businesses.

Property weekly highlights—16 October 2025

This week's edition of Property weekly highlights includes: the Law Society issuing a new TA6 property information form, the latest HM Land Registry updates, the BPF’s response to the consultation on strengthening leaseholder protections and cases on residential service charges, a mortgagee’s relief from forfeiture, defective new-builds, tax reliefs on an option to purchase a residential property, electrical condition reports under the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016, boundary agreements and business rates avoidance.

Non-domestic rates avoidance, liquidation schemes and a moral conundrum (Wigan Council v Property Alliance Group Ltd; Trafford Council v Property Alliance Group Ltd)

Local Government analysis: This is a decision of the Business and Property Courts declaring ineffective two liquidation schemes (‘the Schemes’) deployed by the property investment and development company Property Alliance Group (‘PAG’) and designed to avoid PAG paying non-domestic rates. The case is another in a long line of authorities concerning NDR avoidance schemes and considers the application of the Supreme Court decision of Rossendale Borough Council v Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd [2021] UKSC 16; [2022] AC 690. Written by Stephanie Smith, barrister at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square.

'Simple' flood defence measures could save UK £740m a year

Law360, London: Simple and affordable flood resilience measures could save the UK up to £740m a year, Britain's government state-backed flood reinsurance programme said on 13 October 2025, calling on insurers and policymakers to work towards better home protection.