Lease surrenders

Lease surrenders

A surrender is a transfer by a tenant to its landlord. The lease 'merges' into the landlord's interest. Rent will cease accruing at the point of surrender, as will liability for the performance of covenants in the lease. However, in the absence of an express release, both parties remain liable for breaches arising prior to the surrender. A lease surrender requires mutual agreement between the landlord and the tenant.

There are two types of surrender—express and implied (occurs by operation of law):

•
express—which is achieved formally, in writing, usually by deed, although this is not always necessary, see Practice Note: Lease surrenders
•
implied—this occurs when the unequivocal conduct of both parties is inconsistent with the continuation of the tenancy, see Practice Note: Surrender by operation of law (implied surrender)

Our Practice Notes in this topic provide both general guidance on lease surrenders and guidance on specific issues encountered in the course of a lease surrender, including guidance on:

•
key aspects of lease surrenders, eg:
1. ◦
  an explanation of what constitutes a lease surrender
2. ◦
  the differences between an express surrender and a surrender

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property News

Property weekly highlights—1 May 2025

This week's edition of Property weekly highlights includes: a Court of Appeal case on boundary disputes, analysis of the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 and an Upper Tribunal case concerning the renewal of an Electronic Communications Code agreement.

Telecommunications Code—redevelopment (Vodafone v Icon & AP Wireless)

Property Disputes analysis: In a wide-ranging and interesting review of various creative arguments seeking to establish grounds for opposing the renewal of a subsisting code agreement under paragraphs 31(4) (a), (c) and (d) of the Electronic Communications Code (‘Code’), the Upper Tribunal (‘UT’) held that the grounds were not proven. This update focuses on grounds 31(4) (c) and (d), namely having an intention to redevelop, and the paragraph 21 public benefit test. Written by David Jones and Mark Barley, associate and partner at Womble Bond Dickinson.

Upper Tribunal denies SDLT overpayment relief in failed late MDR claim (L-L-O Contracting Ltd and others v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In L-L-O Contracting Ltd and others v HMRC, the Upper Tribunal (UT) dismissed the companies’ appeals against the First-tier Tax Tribunal’s (FTT) decision to dismiss appeals against HMRC’s decision not to allow claims to SDLT overpayment relief. The companies had not claimed multiple dwellings relief (MDR) in their SDLT returns and, having missed the time limit for making the claims, sought to obtain the relief by way of overpayment relief claims under paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 of the Finance Act 2003 (FA 2003).

HM Land Registry publishes updated guidance on non-monetary transfer fees

HM Land Registry has updated its Registration Services fees guidance to clarify information regarding transfers or assents of registered estates not made for monetary consideration. The update provides additional detail under the 'Transactions under Scale 2' section about how fees are calculated for these types of transfers. This technical clarification maintains existing fee structures while providing greater clarity on their application.

Lease surrenders