Corporate insolvency

A company becomes insolvent if it does not have enough assets to cover its debts and/or it cannot pay its debts on the due dates. It is the directors’ responsibility to know whether or not the company is trading while insolvent and they can be held legally responsible for continuing to trade in that situation. The decision to appoint receivers, liquidators and administrators is the responsibility of the appropriate funding bodies (ie banks and lending institutions), creditors, the courts or the company itself, depending on the procedure.

General

Insolvency in the UK is:

•
governed by Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024
•
subject to the jurisdiction of the High Court and designated County Courts

Companies in financial difficulty may be subject to various insolvency procedures, including:

•
company voluntary arrangements (CVAs)
•
administration
•
administrative receivership
•
voluntary winding-up (by creditors or members)
•
compulsory winding-up (by the court)

Spurred on by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and a desire to mitigate the effect on businesses of the government-imposed lockdown, the government expedited new insolvency legislation, resulting in CIGA

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property News

Rectification of village green register (Cotham School v Bristol City Council)

Planning analysis: This claim was issued under CPR Part 8 pursuant to section 14(b) of the Commons Registration Act 1965 (CRA 1965) to rectify the village greens register to remove the land used by the school for sports and by the public for recreation. The land was registered contrary to the village green inspector’s recommendation. The claim relied upon six grounds, including statutory incompatibility and the use being contentious and not as of right by reason of signs on the land and statements made by the claimant contesting the unrestricted public use. The judge concluded that the land did not meet the statutory criteria in section 15 of the Commons Act 2006 (CA 2006) and that it would be just in the circumstances to remove the land from the register. Written by Stephen Morgan, barrister at Landmark Chambers Chambers.

Law Commission consults on chancel repair liability and registration reform

The Law Commission has launched a consultation on proposed reforms to the law governing land registration and chancel repair liability (CRL)—an obligation requiring landowners to pay for certain repairs to a local church. The proposals would amend the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002) to clarify that CRL only affects property buyers if it is registered against the property title. The consultation also explores the current scope of CRL in Wales, which appears to have been considerably reduced by the Welsh Church Act 1914. The consultation closes on 15 November 2025, after which the Law Commission intends to analyse responses and publish final recommendations in 2026.

Valuation negligence (Bratt v Jones)

Property Disputes analysis: In Bratt v Jones, the Court of Appeal reaffirmed that to establish negligence against a valuer, the claimant must demonstrate both that the valuation fell outside the applicable bracket and that the valuer failed to exercise reasonable care and skill. The decision confirms the continued relevance of the 'bracket' concept in valuation negligence claims and clarifies that being outside the bracket does not automatically imply negligence. Written by Tom Bell and Priya Gopal, barristers at Gatehouse Chambers.

Scottish FTT upholds Revenue Scotland’s assessments relating to incorrectly claimed LBTT group relief (Abbotsford Property Group Ltd v Revenue Scotland)

Tax analysis: In Abbotsford Property Group Ltd, the Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland (the Scottish FTT) upheld Revenue Scotland's assessments against two appellants for incorrectly claimed Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) group relief, while differentiating the penalties applicable to each appellant based on timing and circumstances.