Defendant exempt from affordable housing planning obligation (Westminster City Council v Gems House)
Planning analysis: In this claim Westminster City Council sought to enforce a planning obligation to provide affordable housing in accordance with an agreement under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The defendants were not parties to the agreement and claimed to benefit from an express exemption clause, the interpretation of which was in dispute. The single short issue raised by the claim was whether the first defendant was entitled to claim the benefit of an exemption from the obligation as a person deriving title through a mortgagee of a registered social provider, where the mortgagor had been compulsorily removed from the register after obtaining the mortgage and before the mortgagee transferred its interest to the first defendant. The judgment sets out the principles applicable to the interpretation of these agreements and the competing arguments. The judge found that the defendants’ interest in the affordable housing units came within the claimed exemption, such that they were entitled to sell the units on the open market. Written by Harriet Townsend KC, barrister, at Cornerstone Barristers.