Highway obstructions and nuisance

Highway obstructions

The fundamental public right in relation to a highway is for individual members of the public to pass and re-pass along its length. Along most highways, people have an additional legal right to use vehicular transport and/or to ride a horse and/or to drive animals from one place to another. See Practice Note: Definition and classification of highways.

Section 137 of the Highways Act 1980 (HiA 1980) states that it is an offence ‘if a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway’.

Apart from under the type of specific statutory provisions considered below, a highway authority has no power to permit or licence any form of obstruction or encroachment on the highway. Any permission given tacitly or without a statutory basis will be invalid.

The highway authority is also under a general duty to assert and protect the rights of the public to the use and enjoyment of any highway for which they are the highway authority. As to the powers and duties of highways authorities in relation to highway obstructions,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Planning News

Welsh Government launches consultation on £547m Local Growth Fund

The Welsh Government has launched a six-week public consultation on proposals for a new Local Growth Fund, which will invest £547m over three years to support regional economic development in Wales. For the first time since the UK’s exit from the EU, responsibility for regional economic development decisions will return to the Welsh Government, which will design and implement an Investment Plan in collaboration with the UK Government to ensure alignment with UK-wide growth objectives. The consultation seeks views on the fund’s principles, priorities, objectives, and delivery model ahead of its planned launch in April 2026. The consultation will close on 19 December 2025.

Court of Appeal confirms flexible application of the proximity principle in waste planning decisions (Stop Portland Waste Incinerator v SHCLG)

Planning analysis: In Stop Portland Waste Incinerator v SHCLG, the Court of Appeal held that the Secretary of State had met her duty u to give reasons for granting permission for an energy recovery facility. The court confirmed that the ‘proximity principle’ in the joint local waste development plan is a matter of planning judgment to be applied with realism, not a strict rule favouring the nearest or allocated site.

Secretary of State grants development consent for Cory Decarbonisation Project

The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero has granted development consent for the Cory Decarbonisation Project, which involves the construction and operation of a carbon capture plant, associated storage infrastructure and a marine export terminal.

PINS announces upcoming changes to planning appeal submission process

The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) has announced upcoming changes to the planning appeal submission process. Paper appeal forms will no longer be issued from 1 December 2025 and will not be accepted from 1 April 2026. From that date, appeals must be made via the Appeal a Planning Decision digital service. The new process will initially apply to householder, section 78 (full planning) and section 20 (listed building and conservation area) appeals, with other appeal types to be added in the future. Other appeal types should continue to be submitted via the Appeals Casework Portal or by post using paper forms. PINS will also update its published correspondence address from 1 December 2025.