Planning appeals

When can a decision be appealed?

There is a right of appeal against most local planning authority (LPA) decisions in respect of planning applications and other applications for planning consents.

An appeal can be made on the grounds that the LPA has:

  1. refused an application for planning permission or permission in principle

  2. granted permission subject to conditions

  3. refused an application for any consent, agreement or approval required by a planning condition, or granted it subject to conditions

  4. taken longer than eight weeks to decide the application (or 13 weeks for a larger development or 16 weeks if the application includes an environmental impact assessment)

Making an appeal should be a last resort. Before making an appeal, the appellant should first consider re-engaging with the LPA to discuss whether any changes to the proposal would make it more acceptable and likely to gain permission. It may be possible to make a further planning application without charge.

Applicants should give consideration to the merits of the case, and whether there are strong grounds to contest the reasons for refusal of permission, or the conditions attached

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Planning News

High Court gives guidance on the new duty to ‘seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty’ of AONB for planning authorities (CPRE Kent v SSHCLG)

Planning analysis: Section 85(A1) of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (CRWA 2000) came into effect on 26 December 2023 following amendments to that Act made by section 245 of the Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023 (LURA 2023). The provision requires relevant authorities to ‘seek to further the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty’ of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (‘AONB’) when exercising functions affecting such land. This case concerned a challenge to the November 2024 decision of the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (‘the Secretary of State’) to grant planning permission for the construction of 165 dwellings and associated works in the High Weald AONB. The grounds of challenge were that the Secretary of State had breached the CRWA 2000, s 85(A1) duty (Ground 1) or alternatively, had given inadequate reasons for concluding that the duty had been complied with (Ground 2). The main issue for the High Court was whether the words ‘seek to further’ contained in the amended section 85(A1) duty had altered the substance of the duty so as to require a decision-maker to refuse planning permission for development if it is found that the proposal would cause harm to an AONB by failing to conserve or enhance its natural beauty. In dismissing the claim and upholding the Secretary of State’s decision, the judge provided guidance on the requirements of the CRWA 2000, s 85(A1) duty in the context of planning decisions affecting AONBs. Written by Max Millington, barrister at Cornerstone Barristers.

View Planning by content type :

Popular documents