Home / Pensions / Pensions bodies / The Pensions Regulator

Legal News

TPR has no right to privileged documents (Bloom v The Pensions Regulator)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 26 January 2012
Published by a LexisNexis Pensions expert

Table of contents

  • Original news
  • What were the facts?
  • What legal principles applied?
  • What was decided?
  • What are the practical implications of this case?

Article summary

In Bloom v The Pensions Regulator (Nortel), the High Court held that the Pensions Regulator did not have rights to production of documents which are privileged.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

4 News
View More
7 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 News
View More
7 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Contributory negligence in personal injury claims

Contributory negligence in personal injury claimsContributory negligence is a partial defence which can lead to a discount in damages.Other defences may also be relevant. See Practice Notes: Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury? and Was the claimant involved in an illegal activity?If a

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements

Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements[Insert addressee details]Dear [insert name][It is our understanding that [insert name of prospective employee] [was an employee of yours between the dates of [insert dates as appropriate] OR is a current employee of